Agenda - Council - 04/24/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10) That the proposed PUD does vary from the lot size, lot width and front yard setback standards of the UR zone in which the PUD is to be located. The lot widths, lot sizes and setbacks in the proposed PUD will be less than the standard requirements of the UR zoning district in which the proposed PUD is located. That these differences from the City's UR zoning district are justified by the design of the development in that approximately Z0% of the gross area of the PUD has been or will be in the form of open space dedicated to public use. These public use areas are (1) the park area in Flintwood Hills I previously dedicated to the public for use by the proposed Flintwood Hills Second Addition; (Z) the ponding area of 1.8 acres for the proposed PUD's drainage and (3) the conveyance to the City of approximately 1.5 acres of property adjacent to the PUD and adjacent to the old Ramsey Township Town Hall. A typical Ramsey urban plat would be required to dedicate only 109{ of its gross area for similar uses. 11) That the plan will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development as there is adequate park area for use by the residents in the Flintwood Hills I park adjacent to the proposed PUD; the proposed PUD contains within its own boundaries streets necessary to serve its future residents and the applicant will be required at its own cost to provide appropriate municipal facilities to serve the new residential utilities. 1Z) That the PUD will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property as it is a predominantly residential development and the adjacent properties surrounding the PUD are either existing residential uses or zoned for residential use; the access to the PUD is adequate to serve the additional residents, as well as existing residents. That the housing units to be constructed in the PUD will be of the type, construction, size and architecture as to be comparable to other residential structures in the neighborhood and elsewhere in the City of Ramsey. That this will be assured by the restrictive covenants to be filed with the PUD, as well as relevant City regulations. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Findings of Fact was duly seconded by Mayor Gamec and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Sorte~)erg and Schlueter and the following voted against the same: N one and the following were absent: Councilmembers Reimann and Van wagner whereupon said Findings of Fact were declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the 1Zth day of March, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor City Administrator/Clerk