Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br /> <br /> ! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br /> PUBLIC HEARING <br /> CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> ANOKA COUNTY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />A public hea~ing was held by the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission on <br />Tuesday, February 7, 1984 at the Ramsey Municipal Center, 15153 Nowthen <br />Blvd. N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota, regarding Request For Preliminary Approval <br />and Rezoning For Flintwood Hills Planned Unit. Development. <br /> <br />Men,bets P~esent: <br /> <br />Mr. Kenneth Peterson, Chair~nan <br />Mr. Benjamin Deemer <br />Mr. Gerald Zimmermau <br />Dr. Duane Kennen <br />Mr. Terry Hendrlksen <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />City Engineer Peter Raatikka <br />City thilding Official Clayton Berg <br /> <br />Members Absent: Mr. Charles LaDue <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson called the public hearing to order at 7:37 p.m. <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br /> <br />Dick Carson - Stated that the proposed PUD is located west of Hwy. #47 and <br />north of Industry Blvd. and consists of approximately ~9.6 acres of land <br />adjacent to Flintwood I. At one time 327 units were proposed and after <br />a g~eat deal of research the developer felt changes were needed. Developer <br />is not proposing 1@2 units -- 180 units residential housing and 2 commercial <br />units. The type of housing proposed is courtyard (g~oup of 4 single dwelling <br />homes on their own individual lot with one common driveway). A homeowners <br />association will Be responsible for maintenance, snow removal and lawn care. <br />A restrictive convenance has been prepared to control the project, especially <br />f~om au architectural aspect. An MSA street will go through the project. <br /> <br />Art Dunn - 15140 Yolite - Inquired if the restrictive convenance is available <br />for review and will it be included in the PUD and subject to Planning and <br />Zoning and Council approval? <br /> <br />Dick Carson - Replied that a restrictive covenance is not required by PUD <br />ordinance, but the developer will comply if it is requested by Planning and <br />Zoning and Council. Developer is also willing to make copies of the <br />covenance available for review. The covenance will be included in the abstract. <br /> <br />Art Dunn - Inquired if this plan is being approved or is the total allowable <br />density being approved? <br /> <br />Mr. Berg replied that approval would be for this plan only. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson - Stated that after the final approval, the developer cannot <br />change the density; there is the allowance for minimal flexibility on lot size. <br /> <br /> <br />