Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> PROPOSED <br />FINDINGS OF FACT 00 <br />FOR DANIEL KUECHLE <br /> <br />1) That the applicant properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to <br />construct a detached accessory building larger than permitted by City Code in <br />front of the front setback of his principal structure. <br /> <br />Z) That the setback of the proposed accessory building fron the front property <br />line will comply with City Code. <br /> <br />3) That the applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing <br />pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance on July 24, 1984. That said public hearing <br />was properly advertised and the minutes of said public hearing are hereby <br />incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />4) That the combined square footage of the attached and detached accessory <br />structures will not exceed the total allowable square footage for accessory buildings. <br /> <br />5) That the property is generally known as 15345 Sunfish Lake Blvd. N.W. and <br />is legally described as the North ZS0 feet of the South 544.5 feet of the Southwest <br />Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka <br />County. <br /> <br />6) That such a variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of <br />a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the <br />same district and in the same vicinity. <br /> <br />7) That the authorization of such a variance will not be of substantial detriment <br />to the adjacent properties and will not materially impair the intent and purpose <br />of this ordinance or the public interest. <br /> <br />8) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property is not so general <br />or reoccurant in nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of <br />a general regulation for such conditions or situations. <br /> <br />9) That the variance observes the spirit and .intent of the ordinance and is not <br />contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br />10) That properly constructed, the structure will comply with the requirements <br />of the State Building Code. <br /> <br />11) That the applicant has agreed to enter into a development agreement in <br />consideration of said variance. <br /> <br /> <br />