Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ii <br />I <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners LaDue, Johnson, <br />Hendriksen, Deemer and Zimmerman. Voting No: None.. Absent: Commissioner <br />Kennen. <br /> <br />Commission reviewed the proposed agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Landowski stated that he has no problem with the findings of fact or the <br />proposed agreement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated that he would like to see the proposed access onto <br />Armstrong Blvd. deleted because it just barely allows for a stack/ng distance <br />from the highway should that intersection become signalized. .Commissioner <br />Deemer recommended going with two accesses onto Riverdale. <br /> <br />Mr. Landowski stated that he has no problem with Commissioner"Deemer's <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is that Item #2 of the Agreement should be modified to <br />specify that no access onto Armstrong Blvd. be allowed. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to recommend <br />approving the proposed conditional use permit agreement for Mr. Thomas Landowski <br />to manufacture mattresses, box springs and softside waterbeds in a B-1 Business <br />zone. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, LaDue, <br />Hendriksen, Johnson and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner <br />Kennen. <br /> <br />Case #5: '.Re~ugst ~or Rszonin~ From R-1 Residential to B-1 Business For H~-Ten <br /> ~x~rts; .Case Of Mr. Dick Hagen: . I/ <br /> <br />~ Berg stated that Mr..~agen is %%n~ble to attend this.meeting as he'is-in the <br />hospital. Mr. Berg"stated that the property currentlYabuts B-l~roperty o~ <br />the east. Mr. Hagen would like to expand his business and does not want to do <br />so by way of a conditional use permit. '~ '- ~'- ~" <br /> <br />Moti°n-~'by-Commissioner Deemer~and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman'to table <br />this case until Mr. Hagen can be present._to discuss the requeSt with Planning <br />and Zoning as the expansion might conflict with'needed easements if Riverdale <br />Drive is extended to the west through .this ~roperty. , <br /> <br /> Motion carried.' Voting. ~s'.~ '-~C~~ 'P~t~6h';" ~!ssioners LaDle, Deemer <br /> -. Zimmerman;~ H~d~iksen and .Johnson. Voting No:' ..~None.~:i~ Absent: "~-:?~ommissioner <br /> <br /> Commissioner~Deemer 'stated-that he is not~:opposed to the reqU~-s~~'f°r' ~eZoning, <br />": '"':~that he' will~,~°te' in:,fav°r'of it hut he wants ~to talk "to Mr. 'Hagen regarding. <br /> not building. Where ?n, easement .might be needed in the,-future F<:??':-' -:, ' ~ <br /> <br />: 'Mr. Berg POinted out' that-th~'.Cit~ :cannot.::restrict~:~6/ldtng:witho. u% ::obtaining <br /> -"~:i~an easement.first; Mr, Hagen maY:-be~:agreeabl. 6:~tolthe'>,idea"of riot',building?~. <br /> <br /> the new proper.ty~'0W~e._r'~ght,no~be S°:agreeahle$!~??~¥,::'~.~, :~ ..... . ' <br /> <br /> Case #6: Request For Sketch Plan Approval; Ca'se Of Mr. Robert Hoffman: <br /> <br /> City Engineer Raatikka stated that Mr. ~offman has decided not to plat this <br /> <br />Z/May 1, _1984 <br /> <br /> <br />