My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/26/1984
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1984
>
Agenda - Council - 06/26/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:17:21 AM
Creation date
7/14/2004 8:02:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/26/1984
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developable acreage 711 r approxJJn~tely 10,100 feet <br /> g. Number of residential unit.,. 1292 0 Co~nerctal, industrial, or tnstttu- <br />I tional .~quare footage (if applicable) ~/~, <br />10. Number of proposed parking spaces_ H/R. <br />I~1, List all known local, state and federal permits/approvals/funding required: <br /> <br />mLevel of Governm~ht Type and # of Permit <br /> State: MDNR - Water appropriation per, nit for dewatering <br /> <br />State: M~CA T State Disposal System permit <br />I Local: <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />I <br />m <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />m <br />m <br /> <br />Is the proposed project inconsistent with any: <br /> <br />Status <br /> <br />not applied for <br /> <br />not applied for <br /> <br />a. adopted land use ordinances? x___No Yes <br />b. adopted comprehensive land use plans? x No Yes <br />c. state or federal resource/mangement plans? x No---'Yes <br />If yes, explain: The proposal is consistent with the R~sey Cc~prehenstve Sewer Plan <br />and the Hetropolitan Council's Water ~esources DeveloI~ent Guide/Policy Plan. However, <br />the latter does not clearly ind/cate which alternative will be provided for treatment <br />of wastes subsequent to the Anoka plant phaseout in the late 1980's. <br />Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. <br /> <br />See page 2a. <br /> <br />Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following categories? <br />(Percentages should total 100% before and after construction) <br /> <br /> Before After <br />Forest/Wooded ~ '0 % <br />Brush % % <br />Grassland ~ o % <br />Cropland ' % % <br /> <br /> Before After <br />Urban vacant ~ o % <br />Wetland (types 3-8) <br />Impervious Surface o % zoo % <br />Other(Specify) <br /> <br />Describe the type and location of soils on the site map. Give the SCS soil <br />classification types, if known. (Bee Figl~re 4) Soils south of County Road ll6 a~e <br />~isturbed by gravel mining operations. Soils north of County P~ad 116 are of the <br />Hubbard Nymore association, excessively drained and sandy throughout. Specific SCS <br />soil classification ty~es present in the area in order of greatest occurrence are: Duelm <br />loamy coarse sands, Hubbard coarse sands, Nymore loamy sand, marsh soils & Isanti fine <br />Does the site eorltain peat soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow limestone sandy loa~. <br />formations, abandoned wells, or other geologic hazards? No X' Yes <br />Explain: $me peat soils are present in the marshy areas al°rig the,,gast side o~ the <br />Flintwood hills sub~ivision.' They will not impact the sewer excavation or installation. <br /> <br />mi7. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />What is the approximate depth (in feet) to: <br /> <br />groundwate~ 4_ min. 12 avg. 'b. <br /> <br />bedrock min. avg. <br />greater than 150 feet <br /> <br />x No Yes <br />x--No '-'Yes <br />x No --Yes <br /> <br />Does any part of the project include: <br />a. Shoreland zoning distrt¢t? <br />b. lO0-year floodplain?" ':. <br />c. Wild and scenic river districts? <br /> Identify.water body and shoreland classification: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.