My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/25/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2016
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 10/25/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:27:04 PM
Creation date
11/18/2016 11:08:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
from day one and have been pulled apart a bit in the meantime, which has made it tricky to put <br />them back together. She stated that she would prefer one conversation that is designed to <br />intersect. <br />Councilmember Shryock agreed with Mayor Strommen's comments. She stated that the parks <br />plan has always had a co -mingling of business and recreation. She liked the idea of not making a <br />full decision today and instead integrate this into the information that is gathered on Thursday. <br />She noted a lot of great potential for business and recreation but would like to see those elements <br />better partnered together. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that he is excited for the <br />discussion Thursday, as that will help the group refocus on the vision. He stated that regardless <br />of the vision the Lake Ramsey area will remain as a park. He stated that one question to the <br />panel will be to what degree is park development a catalyst for development, both residential and <br />commercial. <br />Councilmember Riley asked if this design work has ever been completed. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied that this level of planning <br />has never occurred. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that this is hard programming that has been part of the plan <br />for some time and therefore he could support the idea in concept that this is the direction the <br />group should move M. He was unsure that waiting until Friday would be necessary. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that the partnership with commercial may help mold the <br />development of the park, noting that the panelists Thursday will provide additional input that <br />could shape the plan a bit differently. She asked the timeframe if the Council delays action. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that he was looking forward <br />to working on this during the fall and winter in order to balance daily staffing duties. He stated <br />that this plan is already budgeted to occur in 2016. He stated that it would be great to work on <br />this in concept with the revisioning. <br />The consensus of the Council was to direct staff to continue to work on this through the meeting <br />on November 7th <br />3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION <br />3.01: Review Future Topics/ Calendar <br />Noted. <br />4. MAYOR / COUNCIL / STAFF INPUT <br />City Council Work Session / October 25, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.