Laserfiche WebLink
would extend the completion date of the design due to current workloads. Additionally,the City may lose out on <br /> some innovative design approaches.Finally,having detailed designs and estimates will reduce the chance of <br /> change-orders and unexpected cost overruns during construction. <br /> Alternative 94-Recommend that the City Council not authorize design services and direct installation without <br /> formal design. This option is not recommended.In addition to the steps outlined above,it is Staffs understanding <br /> that the scope is more than just landscaping(street lighting,placemaking elements,pedestrian elements, etc.). <br /> Funding Source: <br /> Funding for these design services would come from the Public Improvement Revolving(PIR)Fund.Note-this <br /> funding sources was originally proposed to the Public Works Committee as professional services line items from <br /> the General Fund. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> The Public Works Committee recommended moving forward with design services on a 2-1 vote. At the time of <br /> finalization of this case,minutes from the Public Works Committee were not yet available. <br /> Action: <br /> Motion to approve the attached proposal from WSB for Streetscape Design Services. <br /> Attachments <br /> Proposal <br /> Form Review <br /> Inbox Reviewed By Date <br /> Grant Riemer Grant Riemer 10/20/2016 08:39 AM <br /> Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 10/20/2016 10:07 AM <br /> Form Started By:Tim Gladhill Started On: 10/17/2016 03:32 PM <br /> Final Approval Date:10/20/2016 <br />