Laserfiche WebLink
d. That the establishment of the proposed use will not impede the orderly <br /> and normal development and improvez~ent o£ the surrounding property for uses <br /> permitted in the R-1 Residential District; and <br /> <br /> e. That the proposed use vii1 confor~ to all applicable regulations of the <br /> R-1 Residential District. <br /> <br />11. That the Performance Standards are as follows: <br /> <br /> s. That fire protection is provided by the cities of Anoka and Elk River <br /> and the proposed use will not create a fire hazard; <br /> <br /> b. That the proposed use will not create any electrical disturbance; <br /> <br /> c. That the proposed use will not create any noise disturbance; <br /> <br /> d, That the proposed use will not create any vibration disturbance; <br /> <br /> e. That the proposed use will not create any malodorous gas or matter; <br /> f. That the proposed use will not create any air pollution; <br /> g. That the proposed use viii not create glare from lighting devices; <br /> h. That the proposed use viii not create any wind or water erosion; and <br /> i. That the proposed use viii not create any water pollution. <br /> <br /> 12. That the City reserves the right to inspect the property at any time if it <br /> receives complaints from adjoining property owners. <br /> <br /> 13. That City staff received a letter from Mr. Hark ~adzink, 7810 156th Avenue <br /> N.W. dated February 4, 1986 objecting to ~r. Knudson% request. <br /> <br /> 14. That City staff received a letter dated February 4, 1986 from ~r. Gregory <br /> Berres, 7?20 156th Avenue N.W. objecting to Hr. Knudson's request. <br /> <br /> 15. That City staff received a letter dated February 4~ 1986 from Hr. ¥ictor <br /> Hazenah, 15231 Jackal Street H.~. objecting to Mr. [hudson's request. <br /> <br /> 16. That the Planning Commission received a petition dated February 4, 1986 <br /> from residents opposing Hr. Knudson's request for a conditional use pe~it. <br /> <br /> The motion for the adoption fo the foregoing findings of fact was duly seconded <br /> by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted <br /> in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />whereupon said findings of fact were declared duly passed and adopted by the <br />Ra~sey City Council this the day of , 1986. <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />