Laserfiche WebLink
M~. Peck stated that the Park and Rec Commission does not have a problem with <br />park dedication, lie realizes that the Park ~oard has not finalized everything, <br />but he and his fiz~n have cooperated all along and shouldn't be penalized. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson called for a second to the motion on the floor, <br /> <br />Motion dies for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner LaDue to recommend approval of the request for <br />preliminary plan approval of the second phase of Northfork P.U.D. as proposed, <br />taking into consideration items raised by City Engineer Pete Raatikka in his <br />letter of June 17, 1986, in particular Item {8 that addresses water frontage <br />and lot width requirements. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Chairman Peterson and Commissioner Zimmerman wanted to <br />clarify that they would meet the 200' frontage requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zi~neman seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commission Rendriksen was concerned that the Park and <br />Recreation Commission had not made a final determination on whether to take the <br />fee or land to satisfy the park dedication requirement. Ne stated that this <br />was the City's opportunity to start a trail system for the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Peck stated that this viii be resolved before final plat approval when the <br />Park and Recreation Commission decides bet-~een a cash or land dedication. He <br />stated that he does not intend to cause any hard feelings. <br /> <br />Mr. Neyer stated that there were easements for trails in the first phase of the <br />development. <br /> <br />Pts. ltorris explained that traditionally preliminary plat is approved by the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission and then the Park and Recreation Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hendriksen stated that his concern is that the City Council will <br />be acting on this at their meeting on the 24th before the Park and Recreation <br />Commission*s recommendation. <br /> <br />Ptr. Peck stated that this is just preliminary plat approval and that the <br />Commission wouldn*t be making any commitments tonight by making a <br />recommendation. Everything viii be resolved before final plat approval is <br />requested. <br /> <br />Commissioner ltendriksen stated that many times contingencies go to the City <br />Council and they Est overlooked and never addressed, l~e're dealing with a <br />large parcel of land. <br /> <br />Nr. Peck stated that Park and Rec Commission has concerns that the trail system <br />may be only within the Northfork P,U.D. and would not connect to a City-vide <br />trail system. <br /> <br />Amendment by Co~issioner Hendriksen and seconded by Coaaissioner Zimmerman to <br />recommend that the Park and Recreation Commission review the plan and recommend <br />and present park dedication requirements to the City Council before the Council <br />acts on the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Special P & Z/June 17, 1986 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />