My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/04/86
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
03/04/86
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 4:11:25 PM
Creation date
7/23/2004 11:16:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
03/04/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br /> <br />~"~4M TSS I~ ~tJS INESS <br /> <br />And Serule~ <br />~rl~a <br /> <br />[] During the l~lic hearing an~ ~roval of ~, ~ie ~ee ~ae ~1~ ~ <br /> ~le~ fr~ ~e a~ ~l fur~er at.on ~ r~e~ ~ ~r. ~ar~n. <br /> <br /> ~. ~rris e~ ~at ~ter ~ re~ar~, ~e Ct~ Rt~r~ has ~te~i~ <br /> <br /> ~er~ore, s~¢i~ u~ ~mi~ ~ ~raW ~i~o~ ~e ~i~ are ~t <br /> ~s~ ~ ~e r~fi~ zoni~ ordi~ h~ ~n adj~t~ ac~rdin~y. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Ck~missioner Deemer stated that he is still of the opinion that there needs to <br />be a sunset clause in the ordinance regarding non-oonforming uses that have <br />been grandfathered in so that eventually all non-oonforming uses are oontrolled <br />by conditional use pe~itz. <br /> <br />Commissioner He~driksen disagreed on the basis that these psrticular property <br />or, hers have probably invested a great deal of money in designing buildings on <br />their property to acoc~zmodate the grandfathered use; if that use is disallowed, <br />the City has in essence devalued the property. <br /> <br />General discussion ensued and the O0mmission directed Ms. Norris to research <br />the manner in which the State Statute and other cities address the issue of <br />grendfathered non-conforming uses; Ms. Norris is to have this information <br />available for the regular Planning and Zoning meeting in March. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding fencing and screening requirements and the <br />inoonsistent use of the term 'opague' in the ordinance. <br /> <br />~he Co~etssion amended the ordinance draft in the following ways: <br /> <br />1. R-iR Residential District- <br /> <br />~nces <br /> <br />Fencing other than for solely deoorative purposes shall be restricted to <br />side and rear yards. Maximum fence heights shall be eight feet. <br /> <br />2. 1%-10 Residential, R-2O Besidential, R-3U Residential, MR Multiple <br /> Residential - <br /> <br />Fences <br /> <br />Fencing other than for solely decorative purposes shall be restricted to <br />side and rear yards. Side and rear yard maximum fence heights shall be <br />eight feet. <br /> <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />February 19, 1986 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.