Laserfiche WebLink
Schlueter and DeLuca. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Schlueter and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to enter into a development <br />agreement with Great Plains Gas for the construction of an office/display <br />structure at 7411 Hwy. #10 N.W. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mr. Chuba stated that he has reviewed the proposed <br />development agreement and it will not be possible to blacktop, sod/seed or <br />landscape during the current construction season. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Schlueter and Sorteberg amended the motion to include that the <br />development agreement will set a deadline of June 1, 1987, weather permitting, <br />for blacktopping and landscaping. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Schlueter and DeLuca. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Request To Delete Street Assessment: Case Of Mr. George Adams; <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley explained that Mr. Adams approached Council on October 7, 1986 <br />requesting that the remainder of the 1980 street improvement assessment against <br />one of his properties be deleted on the basis that the parcel has been combined <br />with the parcel on which his home is situated. At the time street improvements <br />were made, Mr. Adams did have two parcels which were, at that point in time, <br />developable if fill were added to the vacant parcel. Those parcels were <br />assessed as two separate lots. Since then, Mr. Adams has combined the lots <br />into one parcel because the lot in question is unfeasible to develop. <br />Subsequently, when sealcoating was done this summer, Mr. Adams' property was <br />considered as one assessable unit. <br /> <br />Mr. Adams stated that he feels the vacant lot is and never was buildable; <br />surrounding higher property has been determined unbuildable; the County lowered <br />the value on the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that there are situations where it is cost prohibitive <br />to bring a lot up to buildable requirements; Mr. Adams would probably only have <br />received one assessment for street construction had he brought this to <br />council's attention at the time. The fact that Mr. Adams was allowed to <br />combine the lots and that he only received one assessment for sealcoating seems <br />to confirm the unbuildability of the second parcel. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Schlueter, for <br />discussion, to adopt Resolution #86-170 directing that Mr. George Adams be <br />abate the balance due on an assessment to R1-32-25-14-0016 for Street <br />Improvement Project #80-12; and if adequate funds are not available in that <br />project's debt service fund to cover the abatement, the balance due be derived <br />from the general fund. (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution #86- <br />170>. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Mayor Reimann stated that this issue should have been <br /> October 28, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 11 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />