Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />the Cit~. can still participate by 20% to c~ver the oost of t.he needed <br />oversiz~ng; this is a decision Council will have to make when and if a <br />petition opposing Flintwood I's inclusion in the project is submitted. <br /> <br />Council oonsensus is to allow the current process to ~o forward pursuant to <br />the Charter. <br /> <br />F.~ Mavor/flouneil Input: <br /> <br />a. City Sanitary Sewer Policy - <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that Councilmember Cox has suggested that the City's <br />policy regarding sanitary sewer be published in the City newsletter. <br /> <br />Council consensus is to direct City Staff to prepare a written Sanitary Sewer <br />Policy and that said policy be reviewed by City Council prior to publication <br />in the City newsletter. <br /> <br />b. City Cemetaries - <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that Councilmember Cox, pursuant to resident concern, <br />would like the subject of City cemetaries brought to Council for discussion. <br /> <br />Council consensus is that the subject of City cemetaries was brought up for <br />discussion and Councilmember Cox was not present to address the issue. <br /> <br />A. i%Doroval Of City AttDrnev's Reguest To Bill Reaular Bourlv .l%atem ~9 <br /> ADoli~ants ~%nd Develomrs: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmamber Sorteberg and seconded by Mayor Heitman to approve of <br />the City Attorney billing applicants and developers at his regular office <br />billing fee of $85.00 per bout based on the recon~mendation received from the <br />Personnel O:m~ittee. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Beitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg and <br />Schlueter. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmembers Reimann and COx. <br /> <br />B. ~olice labor [qeaotiations: <br /> <br />Counciln~r Sorteberg stated that the police requested a 5% increase in base <br />pay, a $15 increase in health insurance and one more holiday; the Personnel <br />Con~uittee reoon~ue~ded a 3% increase in cost of living (or base pay), no <br />increase in health insurance and no holiday; the police oounter offer was a 5% <br />increase in base pay, $15 increase in health insurance and no holiday. <br />Councilmamber Sorteberg stated that most of the officers are getting a 2% <br />longevity increase this year and that is the reason for the Personnel <br />Con~uittee regOlllm-=nding a 3%, rather than a 5%, increase in base pay. <br /> <br />Council consensus is to refer this issue back to the Personnel Committee for a <br />counter proposal review. <br /> <br />March 7, 1985 <br />Page 8 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />