Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />For T~mnnrarv ~nditional URe Permit For An Air Rhow At <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that both a temporary and regular conditional use permit <br />require a findings of fact, but a t~mporary conditional use permit does not <br />require a public hearing. <br /> <br />Douglas Fountain - 15255 Garnet Street - Stated that he does not object to the <br />air show but the City should give the residents in the area some relief to <br />traffic and noise as the air show ~oincides with dates of one of the sand race <br />events. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilm~mber COx and seconded by Councilmember Reimann directing <br />City Staff to prepare a findings of fact regarding Mr. Virgil Barnes' request <br />for a temporary conditional use permit for an air show at Gateway North <br />Industrial Airport on August 17 and 18, 1985. Further, that preparation of <br />the findings of fact should be prepared with the idea in mind that Council is <br />leaning towards granting the request and approval of the findings of fact <br />should be placed on Council agenda for April 9, 1985. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Oouncil informed Mr. Barnes that if he is looking towards <br />the air show being an annual event, it would be in his best interest to do the <br />best job possible, especially with respect to traffic and parking. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Beitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, COx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />c~.~e.t]6: D]:ainaae Probl~: ("aRe Of Mr. Jim Arm.~trona: <br /> <br />Mr. Armstrong stated that in addition to his comments during Citizen Input, he <br />would like to point out that the City has a drainage easement on the westerly <br />10 feet of his property and the easterly 10 feet of his neighbors property; <br />presently, the City is draining across the westerly 90-100 feet of his lot. <br />Mr. Armstrong stated that he would like this situation resolved. <br /> <br />City Engineer Raatikka stated that the City looked at exp~nding the ponding <br />area on the Pomraning property but Mr. Pomraning was not agreeable to that. <br /> <br />Council consensus is to direct City Engineer Raatikka to shoot elevations on <br />the park property across the street from Mr. Armstrong and Lake I~a~ca; <br />compare those elevations with elevations taken in 1984; and present these <br />elevations readings to Council at their meeting scheduled for April 9, 1985. <br /> <br />Mr. Armstrong stated that the City could be looking at spending $10,000- <br />$15,000 to redirect drainage and it may only be a temporary solution. <br /> <br />City Engineer Raatikka stated that the new elevation readings will determine <br />whether or not redirecting the drainage will be worthwhile. <br /> <br />Mr. Armstrong noted that because of his work hours he may not always be able <br />to attend Council meetings in which his case is being discussed, but that <br /> March 26, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 25 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />