05/08/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I C~,jt~tee had n~ade a reoc~c~endation in t. his case. Council~er Reimnn stated that the recommendation has been put back into C~dtt~. Counctln~ber Cox stated that the subject recommendation was made during the cease and desist order. Mayor Beibr, an stated that he doesn't understand hc~ the cease and desist order would have an affect on the recommendation; that he see's no point in prolonging this case and would like to address it this evening. Mayor HeJtman stated that he recalls that on April 9 a motion was p~ssed to table the case until this April 16 meeting. Councilme-nber Reimann stated that the Personnel Copmittee discussed Ms. Norris' case at the last Personnel Cc~mittee meeting but no definite decision was arrived at. Counciln~nber Sorteberg stated that be doesn't recall that the Personnel Committee discussed Ms. Norris' case. I· I Councilme~ber Cox stated that he doesn't recall the motion that was made on April 9, but his intent was to send the case back to the Personnel Committee; the only recon~,nendation made was during a cease and desist order and now the issue can be discussed more openly. City Attorney Goodrich stated that during a cease and desist order, no negotiations with Staff regarding salaries may transpire to allc~ time for a hearing and vote. Mayor Heitman irguired as to what new revelations there oould be since the cease and desist that would change the past recommendation endorsed by Planning and Zoning and Economic Development Commissions. I I Council~d~er Cox replied that it is for the Personnel Ccmmtittee to determine. Councilm~Td~er Reimann stated that he feels the addition of another Staff ms~ber should be reviewed because of the ramifications of a union be established; it should be addressed whether or not the City can afford, into the future, the addition of this person and position. I I I I Mayor Beitman stated that the addition of this position is not a new issue and questioned if these points were not addressed before the decision was made to proceed. Council~ber COx replied that no~ there is a union and it is a new issue. Mayor Heitman stated that be is looking for a good reason why this case should be referred back to the Personnel Co~nmittee. Councilm~nber Cox told Mayor }{eitman to do as he pleases in this case. Mayor neitman replied that this is a oouncil of 5. Councilm~mber Cox repeated that there was a motion passed on April 9 to put April 16, 1985 Page 3 o£ 8