Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ramon Burton <br />July 12, 1985 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Waste InventorS <br /> <br />PACE Laboratories, Inc. with the assistance of Waltek, Inc. personnel <br />conducted an inventory of all waste generated at Waltek, Inc. 'This <br />inventory identified a total of 3 hazardous wastes and 4 non-hazardous <br />wastestreams. The hazardous wastestreams identified at Waltek, Inc. <br />uere: l) Sodium hydroxide sludge 2) Freon waste 3) Hydroflouric <br />acid/Nitric acid waste. The non-hazardous wastestreams included grinding <br />residue, wheelobrator residue, shell waste, and oil waste. · <br /> <br />Sodium Hydroxide Sludge - Currently there are 31 55 gallon drums, l0 35 <br />gallon drums and lO lO gallon drums of sodium hydroxide sludge stored <br />on-site at Waltek, Inc. All drums are open head and appear to be full. <br />T~e amount of water in these drums varies from being rock hard to <br />slightly moist. Attached to this letter is our report of laboratory <br />analysis of the sodium hydroxide sludge. Representative samples of the <br />sludge were collected by PACE Laboratories, Inc. from a randomly selected <br />number of the drums. The analysis shows that the only hazardous property <br />exibited by the sodium hydroxide sludge is its pH of 13. This high pH <br />classifies sodium hydroxide sludge as being corrosive. We have completed <br />a Rollins Environmental Permit Application form for disposal of the <br />sodium hydroxide sludge at a permitted hazardous waste landfill. This <br />form needs to be reviewed by Waltek, Inc. and if acceptable signed and <br />forwarded to: <br /> <br />Mr. Gene Jameson <br />Waste Research and Reclamation Company <br />Route 7 <br />Eau Claire, WI <br /> <br />~ased upon our preliminary discussions with Rollins Environmental it <br />appears that the sodium hydroxide sludge would have to be repackaged in <br />~5 gallon drums or 85 gallon over packs prior to off site shipment. <br />~.lowever, there are two other potential options for disposal of this waste <br />u~ich are; on site neutralization and discharge to either the drain field <br />,~ the sanitary sewer system; or identi~ing another industry that can use <br />[ne w~ste as a product in a ~aste exci~ange.- <br /> <br />~l~e feasibility oF on-site neutralization o~ the sodium hydroxide sludge <br />would have to be weighed against its cost verses off-site transportation <br />to a disposal facility and the ability to discharge the resulting <br />neutralized wastewater stream to either your drain field or to the Anoka <br />Sanitary Sewer System. Tills option should only be considered if the <br />~aste exchange concept cannot be realized. We would recommend that a <br />pilot study be performed on the sodium hydroxide sludge to determine the <br />c,)s'~ for neutralizing and tile feasil)lity for discharging the trea~ed <br />:..~st~,~q~ ...... int~ ~i~. 4rain ...... fiel.i r~ A.no.t~.~ Sanitary q~,.~..~.~_r System, <br /> <br /> <br />