Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> <br />6. Ta~_~e: Under Case ~1, unfinished business fr~ August 27, 1985 <br /> agemda, Case %3.C. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Hei~an, (Duncilm~bers Sorteberg, (Dx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />PURLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />(Dun¢il adjourned at 7:40 p.m. in order to conduct the following <br />hearings: <br /> <br />1. Request for off-sale liquor license; case of Mr. George Wilcox. <br /> <br />2. Vacation of old CSAH #5 in front of Lord of Life Lutheran Church. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman called the special (Duncil meeting beck to order at 7:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Request For Sketch Plan Review Of Proposed Plat: <br /> <br />Case Of Mr. Dick <br /> <br />Mr. Carson presented copies of a sketch plan for Holm ~k]ition (property <br />located at Industry Avenu~ a~d Magnesi~0 Street) and requested (Duncil's <br />conditional approval to it p~ior to procccding with the cost of platting. Mr. <br />Carson noted that the approac~ to the new lot will be frc~ Magnesiu-~ Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that Plannin9 and Zoning reo~mmend~ that Mr. Carson go <br />with a oonvenience plat and that variances be granted to topogral~hy, soil <br />borings and street grades. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson stated that the developer has no ~oblem with Ite~ %7 in City <br />Engineer Raatikka's letter dated September 10, 1985, regarding trunk storm <br />drainage assessments. <br /> <br />Motion by (Duncilm~ber (Dx and seconded by Gouncilm~ber Sorteberg imdicating <br />Council's satisfaction with Mr. Carson's sketch plan for Bolm Addition with the <br />provisions contained in Planning and Zoning's reocm~m=-ndation of August 12, <br />1985, City Engi~cr Raatikka's letter dated September 10, 1985 and City G~de. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, (Duncilm~bers Sorteberg, (Dx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case $7.. Review Of Ramsey Board of Review Action In 1985 By_ The state <br /> Oo~missioner Of Revenue: <br /> <br />Mr. Schr~lle stated that the (Dunty Assessor has petitioned the State Board of <br />Equalization to review action taken by Ramsey's Board of Review to reduce <br />property valuations on certain businesses. Mr. Schnelle stated, and <br />Councilmember Gox agreed, that he is not sure it is within the realm of the <br />Gouty Assessor's jurisdiction to bypass the Gouty Board of Review and take <br />the matter directly to the State. <br /> Sept~rber 10, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />