02/05/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

(~buncll ur.n~lro~)y o~rmenta~ to d~per~e ~tt~ the re~ng of the te~olutlon. I~otlon by 0ounclls~bet ~x and secorde~ I~y ~l~t ~r~r9 ~ ~rl~ ~ of ~y~ ~11 ~ 19~S for ~vet~s ~ ~ ~i~on. file ~lu~on carried. Votir~ les: P~ot Beit~a, Oour~ilma~ber~ Sortaberg, (lox, i~eimann and Schl~e~er, Vot~r~ Ro: Rone. ! ! ! ! ! ! tl~ p~lic beatify, ~, Bet9 repliefl that the City Q~arter require~ that the l~bltc bearin9 notlc be p~liabe6 in the City l~lettet, cou~ci~r COx st~t~ that this is a situation vbere delays are ~sti~ a lot of ~, ~i~r ~x r~err~ ~ ~e front ~ ar~cle ~ 3~, 1985 ~' ~i~nt, ~ere ~rs of ~il ~of~s ~ ~ura~ ~ic ~elo~t ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~e ~e o~rt~i~ for ~at ~v~o~ ~ ~e ~a~ ~1 ki~ of ~si~o~ on ~e ~elo~. Playor Beitman stat. e3 that fast does not nec~r~arily ~ean ~ood, but this is ~ of the reasons be inqui£e8 earlier about lncreasin9 ~e f~:eq~er~ of the r~slet~e~. councilx~bet Cox i~uire~ ~by ye ~bould oontin~ to spend ~ore s~r~y ins~ea of oor~ect, in9 the probl~, P~yor Beitman i~quired if the (h~rter ~-lz-cifie~ ~/~eti~er or r~t failure to p~bliah a bearin9 not. Joe in the newsletter ~gat_~_ it. Berg replie~ that suc~ a s~attsvent is rot includ~ in this section of ~ ~arter. City i~tborney coodrid~ stat~ that be doesn't think the City can abide vit~ the c~arter m~d oonscientously not publish ti~ bearir~ roti~e in the newsletter, Councils~ber Cox stated that be thinks this ~ frs~e feature va~ lr~luc~ in ~ c~arter as a protection in cases vbere there is a lot of resident~ ~otentlally affectadl don't think the Onarter comui~ion interded for that feature to affect case~ like this and It~, Batter~erg's, ~or Reitz~n stat_~!~ that be would like the O~arter commission to axle up: an alternative to carry ~ City through these types of situations, I~je 17 of 30