Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> i <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />a~. t~e tnterse=t, io~ c~ ~ J~ OS n~ Azurt~ S~.reet lq~. (l~le~e re, et <br />re~lut.~o~ file <br /> <br />I~tion carried. I/oting Yes: ~k~-yot Beit~an, O~ur~ilm~i:~rs Sorteberg, (lox, <br /> <br />CV~-~ilMt~r C~x req~e~te/ that tit~ Attorr~ Gvodrich researa% ~etber or <br />r~t it ~ould be proper for Oo~'ctl to Bake o~e ~otio, at t. be beginning of <br />meeUirgs t~ ais~ wi~ He re~ir~ of all resolutions tnclude~ in tl~e <br /> <br />f) Request ~o l~le_fi~ ~l~e R~, River Scenic River Boundary Adjacent <br /> River'~ Ber~ - <br /> <br />O~¢il unaninvusly c~nsent~ tv dispense wis ~be reading of tt~e resolutio: <br /> <br />l~tion by (bunciln~rber Sorteber9 ar~ se~ I~, Cvunci~r Reimann to <br />adopt Resolution JB5-22 reOefining the Run, River scenic corridor. <br />(Please refer to zesolution file for Resolution 185-22). <br /> <br />FurU~er Discussion: Councilmenber Schlueter ir~uired as t= 1'~.' long Staff <br />~pect~ that it viii take ko bear back fro~ l~ on this zeguest. Er, Ber9 <br />replied that be didn't knov~ that it could take sonde tike. <br /> <br />~okion carried. Voting Ye~: llayor Bei~n, ~ouncilme~>ers ~ort~ber9, <br />l~i~ann ar~ F~t~lueter. Voting <br /> <br />g) Request ~b Support l~cre~ Densitie~ In River's Bert] Seoor~ Addition <br /> <br />llr. Raudio vas present. <br /> <br />O)uncilm~bez 0ox stated as backup to this case that years ago the City o0 <br />not ~et ~ State bo boy right-of-ray for O~unty 1~. ~5 an8 B~y. J47; a <br />.had been killefl at this location; and be initiated negotiations with <br />Ra~io. As a result of tt~ose r~9otiations ~e ~ere able bo obtain a ne~ <br />lane on Cry. lk]. J5 and B~y. J47, Eight-of-way east of l~. 47, future br] <br />crossing right-of-way, provisions for future eoonc~nic tax base. (buncil~ <br />Oox st~d that all of this vas dor~ in 9ood faiti~ and now lq~. Ra~]io and <br />Foster are Eea~ to develop ar~ the State has put restraints on developw <br />that are far be~r~ Mbat was ~greed to at that time. ~his proposed resol, <br />~oul~ be stating ~ City's s~rt of t~e developer beir~ allo~fl to <br />that property at the density rate float woul6 bare been allo~e8 b&8 U <br />developer not deeded that property to ~ City. ~he developers are on'. <br />asking for ~hat ~a~ a~reed to in 9ood faith a~d nothing ~ore. <br /> <br />~o~cil unanfumttsly oonse~t.~ to dispense with the reading of ~ resolut <br /> ,~anuary 22, 1985 <br /> <br />Pa9e 19 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />