Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ACTIVITY: All Devet.opment <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br />DEFINITON, <br /> <br />All land uses must be reviewed against the criteria in this section. <br /> <br />CRITERIA~ <br /> <br />Each of the following applicable criteria must <br />be answered "yes" on the ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED <br />CRITERIA chart and implemented within the development <br />plan. <br /> <br />Neighborhood <br /> <br />Oompotibilit¥ <br /> <br />THE LAND DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE SYSTEM SHALL PROTECT THE CHARACTER <br />OF NEW AND EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS AGAINST INTRUSIVE AND DISRUP- <br />TIVE DEVELOPMENT. ANY NEGATIVE OR ADVERSE IMPACTS SHALL BE EFFECT- <br />IVELY MITIGATED IN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN..WHEN TWO ADJA- <br />CENT PARCELS ARE DEVELOPED SIMULTANEOUSLY, THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR <br />MITIGATING CONFLICTS IS UPON THE MORE INTENSE USE. WHEN A USE IS THE <br />FIRST TO DEVELOP ON TWO ADJACENT VACANT PARCELS, THE FIRST USE SHALL <br />PROVIDE THE NECESSARY BUFFER TO ANY REASONABLE FUTURE USE AS DETER- <br />MINED BY THE CITY. THE SECOND USE TO DEVELOP SHALL, AT THE TIME IT <br />DEVELOPS, TAKE ALL ADDITIONAL STEPS NECESSARY TO MITIGATE CONFLICTS. <br />THE CITY WILL DETERMINE COMPATIBILITY OF A PROJECT BASED UPON THE <br />EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA DESCRIBED IN <br />"1" THROUGH "4" BELOW: <br /> <br />1. Have all differences between the applicant and the affected <br /> neighborhood as to the social compatibility of the project <br /> been resolved, or have the processes outlined in Administra- <br /> tive Guidelines for "Identifying Impacts on Social Compatibil- <br /> i ty" been fol 1 owed? <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br /> <br />