My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/07/85
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
05/07/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:55:30 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 11:36:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
05/07/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORTS <br /> <br />a) Director of Technical Servioes- <br />Council noted. <br />b) City Assessor - <br /> <br />Council noted. <br /> <br />c) Chief of Polic- <br />Council noted. <br /> <br />! <br />! <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />d) City Engineer- <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka referred to that part of his Staff Report dealing with the R~ <br />River Watershed and stated that he has attended a oouple of meetings and the <br />conoensus is that Anoka, Andover, Goon Rapids and Ramsey should form the Lc~er <br />R~n River Watershed and Burns, Oak Grove and East Bethel should form their (~n <br />watershed. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg noted that Burns does drain into Ramsey, and even if the amount of <br />drainage may not be significant, the qt~_ity might be. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that Burns has a large land area with little develofment <br />and including Burns in the same watershed as Ramsey, Andover, Anoka and Coon <br />Rapids, and the assessment procedure proposed for that watershed, would <br />involve a very hard assessment to Burns. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle noted that Burns has contributed to drainage probl~s in Ramsey <br />in the past. <br /> <br />The Council discussed with Mr. Raatikka the need for alternative methods of <br />assessing so that Burns can conceivably included in the same watershed as <br /> <br />Motion by Councilm~nber Cox and seconded by Mayor ~eih~an that Burns be <br />approached regarding entering into the Ru~ River Watershed on a partner basis <br />with Ramsey and that Burns' response be brought back to Ramsey City Council. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Council~mber Sorteberg stated that Burns' will want to <br />know what their costs will be. Councilm~nber Cox replied that going into a <br />watershed with Ramsey should not cost Burns any more than if they go in with <br />other cities. Mr. Raatikka stated that if the watershed districts are not <br />established, the County will step in and do it. Councilmsmber Cox stated that <br />the R~ River Watershed is just another goverr~ent mandate. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor ~eitman, Oouncilm~bers Sorteberg, COx, <br />Reimann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />March 26, 1985 <br />Page 15 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.