My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
06/04/85
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
06/04/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:56:06 PM
Creation date
7/30/2004 2:27:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
06/04/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> <br />Applicants purchased five acres from a larger parcel along <br />Highway 47. They are requestin9 to split off these five acres <br />without going through the subdivision process. <br /> <br />The following information is enclosed in (D2-d): <br /> <br />a. Site location <br />b. Proposed split <br />c. Application <br /> <br />Commission Action: Your action will be to recommend <br />approval/denial of the request for a variance from the subdivsion <br />requirtments. The following motion is submitted for your <br />consideration: <br /> <br />Moved by and seconded by to recommend <br />approval/denial of the request by H. Towle and J. Duff for a <br />variance from the platting requirements of the subdivision <br />chapter. <br /> <br />Motion passed/failed. Voting yes .... Voting no. . <br /> <br />CASE 95: REOUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM PIATrING REOUIREMENTS OF <br /> SUBDIVISION CHAFi'E:R: CASE OF PHYLLIS IAHN <br /> <br />The Applicant is requesting a variance from the platting <br />requirements of the subdivision chapter to split two five acre <br />parcels into four 2-1/2 acre parcels. These parcels are located <br />west of the Wayside Park in the RB-la Rural Business District. <br />The Applicant has stated that all parcels will have river rights. <br /> <br />The following information is enclosed in (D2-e): <br /> <br />a. Application <br />b. Site location <br />c. Proposed split <br /> <br />Commission Action: Your action will be to recommend <br />approval/denial of the request for a variance from the <br />subdivision chapter. The following motion is submitted for your <br />consideration: <br /> <br />Moved by and seconded by to recommend <br />approval/denial of Phyllis Lahn's request for a variance from the <br />platting requirements of the subdivision chapter. <br /> <br />Motion passed/failed. Voting yes ... Voting no <br /> <br />CASE #6: DISCUSSION R~ING CITY'S PROPOSfD TAX INCREMENT <br /> FINANCING PlAN <br /> <br />Enclosed in (D2-f) is the proposed development program and tax <br />increment financing plan for your review. Also enclosed in (D2-f) <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.