Laserfiche WebLink
CASE 12: REVIEW OF REVISF~ ppF. LTMINARY PlAN FOR WEST OAKS <br /> PI~%NNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; CASE OF NOR~ FCRK. INC. <br /> <br />North Fork, Inc. has withdrawn its preliminary master site plan <br />for the West Oaks planned unit development and is submitting a <br />revised plan for the development of 42 single family residential <br />lots in the northwest corner of the property. The remainder of <br />the property is proposed to be platted as outlots. Access to <br />these lots is proposed to be from Jarvis Street. <br /> <br />Enclosed in (D2-b) is the following information.. <br /> <br />a. Site location <br />b. Revised preliminary plan <br />c. Narrative of development <br /> <br />Commission Action: Your action will be recommend approval/denial <br />of the revised preliminary plan· The following action is <br />sutmitted for your consideration: <br /> <br />Moved by and seconded by to recommend <br />approval/denial of the rezoning and revised preliminary plan of <br />West Oaks planned unit development submitted by North Fork, Inc. <br /> <br />Motion passed/failed. Voting yes <br /> <br />· Voting no . . <br /> <br />CASE ~3: <br /> <br />REOUEST FOR SKETCH PIAN REVIEW OF REPIATTING INCLUDING <br />VARIANCE TO LOT SIZE REOUIREMENTS: CASE OF MF~ BROOK <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Petrucci, a partner in Meadow Brook Estates, is <br />requesting review of a proposed replatting of the Meadowbrook <br />Estates subdivision. ~he subdivision was approved with six 2-1/2 <br />acre lots. Mr. Petrucci is proposing to replat the subdivision <br />into one acre lots. The required minimum lot size in the R-1 <br />Residential District is 2.5 acres. <br /> <br />Enclosed is (D2-c) is the following information: <br /> <br />a. Letter dated May 28, 1985 from Gary Petrucci <br />b. M.S.A. Chapter 62 referred to in Petrucci's <br /> letter <br />c. Site location <br />d. Approved Meadow Brooks Estate plat <br /> <br />Commission Action: No action is necessary at this time other <br />than to direct any comments you may have to the Applicant <br />regarding his request. <br /> <br />CASE ~4: REOUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM PIA~TING REOUIREMENTS OF <br /> SUBDIVISION CHAPTER: CASE OF H. TOWLE AND J. DUFF <br /> <br />The Applicants are requesting a variance from the platting <br />requirements of the subdivision chapter of the city code. The <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />