Laserfiche WebLink
Motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Motion by Ommissio~er Bendriksen and seconded by Gm~issioner Deemer to ~mend <br />Item ~5.d in the findings of fact in the case of Mr. Donald Ness to read as <br />follows~ ~l~at there -re current/y no other appr(Ned similar uses in the City <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, __~k~m_ issioners Deemer, ~umway, <br />;.hm~.rman and Bendriksen. Voting No= None. Absent~ G0~missioner LaDue. <br /> <br />Motion by Ommissioner Ziumerman and seconded by Omni,ioof Shu~way to adopt <br />proposed findings of fact, as ~ended, for Mr. Donald Ness' request for a <br />oonditional use permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes~ (~airman Peterson, (lm~issioners Dee~er, Shu,way, <br />Zi~perman and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. Absent.. Om~issioner LaDue. <br /> <br />__n~,n_ ission consensus is to amend the conditional use permit agreement in the <br />following ways: <br /> <br />1. Change the t/tle 'Gonditional Use Permit Agreement' to 'Special Use <br /> Permit Agreement - ~cme occupation'. <br /> <br />2. Change Ite~ ~4 in the agree~_nt to specify 'Special Use Permit'. <br /> <br />3. ;~d the foll(~ing item to the agreement: '5. ~ere will be no <br /> outside storage of materials and equil~ent.' <br /> <br />Motion by Om~issioner Deemer and seconded by Ommissioner Sh~ay to reo~m~nd <br />apprcwal of the request by Mr. Donald Ness for a special use permit to operate <br />a home occupation fr~m his residence at 7735 156th Avenue N.W. contingent upon <br />the applicant entering into a special use permit agreement, as amended, with <br />the City. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes.. Chairman Peterson, (Im~issioners ~-.mer, Shu~w~, <br />Z/amerman and Hendriksen. Voting No.- None. Absent: (km~nissioner LaDue. <br /> <br />Request For Variance Fr~m Platting Requ_ ire~ents For Metes ADd <br /> Bounds Subdivision: Case Of Mr. Robert Zi~m~r~ <br /> <br />G0mmission consensus is that they would be agreeable to granting' variances to <br />minim~ lot width as it would be consistent with other lots in the area and if <br />Mr. Ziam~.r can meet State building code requirements regarding garage floor <br />being 15" above street elevation. ~he G0~ssion stated that a survey would be <br />beneficial in determining the amount of fill ~cded in the new lot in order to <br />make it buildable and in that case, Mr. Zinm~.r might as well p~ooeed with a <br />convenience Blat rather than metes and bounds subdivision. <br /> <br />Case ~.- Regu_ est For Lot Split: Ca_se Of Mr. Dick Carso~l <br /> <br />Mr. Garson was present regarding the lot split of property located at Industry <br />Avenue and Magnesiu~ Street. <br /> August 12, 1985 <br /> <br />Pege 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />