Laserfiche WebLink
I Motion by Oouncil~be~ COx and seconded ~ Comcil~ber l~eimann directing <br /> City St-_ff to p~e]~re a letter to County ~issioner ~ and the County Board <br /> of Rewiew requesting that they re;Jew Ramsey's Board of Revie~ action regarding <br /> <br />property valuations for oertain Ramsey businesses and support that action; <br />further, to request that the procedure in whic~ this matter reached the State <br />Board of ~ualization be researched and a determination be made as to it's <br />appropriateness. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Opuncilm~bers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />R~imann and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />C~ete Unfinished Council Business Fr~r Gouncil Meetin~ Of <br /> AuGust 27. 1985: <br /> <br />A. ~.rOpO;~__l For nnr~fill ImDact On Market Values - <br /> <br />Mayor Reit~an brought up the follcming ooncerns with the ~xoposal <br />for a Landfill Impact On Market Values Study: Section I.A should <br />include the criteria for determination; Section I.C implies that the <br />prel~rer of the study should have expertise in geology and hydrol(xjy; <br />Section II.A should have included sc~e other cities that also host <br />landfills; Section II.A should have called for a broader base of <br />residential since 85% of Ramsey's tax bsse is residential; Section <br />II.D concentrates on oo~meri~ and should include residential. In <br />sum~%t~y, Mayor Reitman stated that the study cannot be clear and <br />concise without spelling out the criteria. <br /> <br />A~ Hoc 5m~dfill Committee m~ber A1 Pearson was p~esent and stated <br />that there is sc~e conflict regarding whether or not the landfill <br />has affected property values and saleability; the intention is to get <br />an official, objective study of the issue. <br /> <br />Gouncilme~ber Sorteberg stated that he doem't think including other <br />cities in the study would make for a valid comparison; the <br />comparisons should be restricted to properties within the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that it is obvious that a lot of effort was put <br />into the Ixoposal, but if it is apprcwed and bids ~ in, be will <br />review the bids in terms of data offered rather than lowest bid. <br /> <br />Ad Hoc Landfill Gc~ittee m~ber Fo~tain and Mr. Schnelle suggested <br />approving the l~OpoSal as written; if no bids oome in, the proposal <br />can be modified to be more specific. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Hei~an a~d secor~ed by Co~cilm~ber COx to adopt <br />Resolution %85-170 approving a draft proposal to engage a consultant <br />to do a study on the Anoka Lar~lfill's impact on market values on <br />developed residential areas, c~..ercial/industrial areas and platted/ <br />unplatted lands (residential/cc~m~_rcial). f%fcher, that the lxoposal <br />draft is amended to add the follc~in9 itJ~: (Please refer to <br /> September 10, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />