My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/01/85
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
10/01/85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:56:56 PM
Creation date
8/2/2004 2:16:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
10/01/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
resolution file for Resolution %85-170). <br /> <br />Part III. It~ B. <br /> <br />9mt the report ~ Ixescribe the criteria <br />being utilized in arriving at the various <br />findings. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, Oouncilme~bers Reimann, <br />Sorteberg, Gox and Schlueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />1986 Oommunity_ School Budget: <br /> <br />GouncL1 noted receipt of proposed 1986 co~munity school budget. <br /> <br />Case~ DiScussion Regarding Board Of Adjust~mut~ <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that requests for varianoes to acoessory building <br />size are beo~ing very time consuPing for Co~cil; it should be defined <br />what will be acoeptable, modify the ordinance accordingly and enforce it. <br />If the City is going to continue with the variance Ixocess, it should be <br />by a r~t/on fr~ Planning and Zoning or by a Board of Adjustment <br />meeting separate from the Council ~eting or by a sel~rate Board of <br />Adjustment Om~ission. <br /> <br />Gouncil reviewed a survey Ixepared by Ms. Norris regarding acoessory <br />building size limitations in other cities. <br /> <br />Oo~cil discussed various ways the ordinance could be modified. Mr. <br />Sdm~_lle pointed out that the ordinance should also address accessory <br />buildings in urban areas. <br /> <br />Oouncil tabled further discussion of this issue am] directed City Staff to <br /> <br />m send a letter to those request for variance appli~ts currently on 'hold' <br /> informing th~ that City is in the process of reviewing that ordinance <br /> <br /> ' regarding accessory building size. <br />m case ~13: Discussion Of Enforcement Of Ordinances (i.e.. ~gtor <br /> Vehicle/_Operation of Businesses With Lioenses/Accessory <br /> <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br />m <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated he is receiving o0~plaints fr~ citizens regarding <br />properties containing a nt~Pber of junk cars; why hau't the ordinance being <br />enforced? <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that enforoement has been selective and <br />based on formal oomplaints; to do otherwise would require the hiring of a <br />(k~munity Services officer. Mr. Goodrich stated that citizens can contact <br />Ms. Norris at City Hall if they have a o~aint; Ms. Norris will notify <br />the property owner in violation; if the matter is not resolved, the <br />o~nant can sign a formal ~plaint issued by the City Attorr~d and <br />the matter will go to court. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that this issue needs to be addressed for the urban <br />area also by way of oonvenances. <br /> September 10, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br />m <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.