Laserfiche WebLink
IV. <br /> <br />issues have to groups beyond the Metropolitan Council. A current <br />effort under way is a minority leadership meeting at the Council. Co- <br />sponsored by the Council and several minority organizations, the <br />purpose of the event is to inform minority co~nunity leaders mbout <br />the Council, to inform Council members about important issues in the <br />region's minority communities, and to discuss how the Council can <br />better serve and-involve minority people in regional planning. <br /> <br />ISSUES IN CITIZEN PARTICIPATION <br /> <br />During the past year, the Metropolitan Council has taken a serious look <br />at its citizen participation structure and process, in order to assess <br />how successful it has been at receiving public input into regional <br />decisions. Four sources have been tapped to assist in this effort: a <br />staff ad hoc con~nittee representing Council departments and programs that <br />have had active citizen participation efforts over the past few years$ a <br />group of people from outside the Council who have been active partici- <br />pants in and observers of the Council's decision-making process; a <br />Council survey of lg5 mayors, town board chairs and county board chairs <br />in the region; and the Council's Metropolitan and Con~nunity Development <br />Cor~nittee. <br /> <br />Five major issue areas were identified and several recon~nendations were <br />made to guide the Council in strengthening its citizen participation <br />program. These issues and recon~nendations form the basis for the citizen <br />particiption goals, objectives and strategies presented in Part V. <br /> <br />The major issues and recommendations cited by the above sources are: <br /> <br />EARLY INPUT INTO THE PLANNING PROCESS <br /> <br />Potentially affected groups and individuals need to be bro.ught <br />into the planning process earlier. In some cases, very basic <br />policy decisions have been made before public input is requested, <br />putting the public in a reactive role rather than a proactive, <br />participatory role. Also, without early citizen input, Council staff <br />and Councilmembers may become defensive of their technical and policy <br />decisions, and thus reluctant to change them because of public <br />reaction. <br /> <br />The Council needs to have a more direct relationship with local <br />governments. Local officials want individual Council members to <br />holdmore meetings with local officials in their districts to discuss <br />emerging problems or policy proposals at a point early enough in the <br />planning or decision-making process for input to be effective. <br /> <br />Potential conflict should be dealt with early in the planning <br />process. Timely citizen involvement is crucial in helping manage <br />the conflict that certain projects naturally generate. <br /> <br />Council programs need to qpen up the planninq process before recom <br />mendations.are [eleased for public hearing. All programs need to <br />Consider public participation techniques other ~han mandated public <br />hearings, which occur near the end of the decision-making process. <br />Problems are sure to arise when recommendations for implementation <br />are made without input from those who are responsible for <br />implementation. <br /> <br /> <br />