Laserfiche WebLink
Citizen participation activities must be a part of 'business as <br />Usual." Especially in the case of some of the Council's more <br />~ifficult projects, the time needed for citizen participation <br />competes with the total a~ount of time available for project <br />completion. Because of tight planning schedules, citizen <br />participation ts 'squeezed tn" as an afterthought. <br /> <br />IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTITUENCIES--INVOLVEMENT OF NEW CONSTITUENCIES <br /> <br />The Council needs to define its constituency for each regional issue. <br />Different issues attract different constituencies, which, in <br />turn, require different citizen participation strategies. <br /> <br />The Council should seek new groups or individuals who previously may <br />not have been involved but ~/no have a stake in a particular issue. <br />The Council has concentrated its outreach and citizen participation <br />efforts on a standard set of organizations. It needs to do more to <br />involve nonmainstream organizations and individuals not part of <br />organized groups. <br /> <br />Citizen advisory con~nittees need to be more broadly based. Represen- <br />tation from minorities, low-income persons, handicapped persons, <br />business and labor groups, as well as the "lay" public, should be <br />increased. <br /> <br />Minorities and people with low- and moderate-incomes need to be <br />included in Council activities and decisions. Council policy <br />requires equal opportunity in citizen participation. The Council <br />needs to continue to strengthen its affirmative action efforts to <br />ensure equal opportunity in citizen participation. <br /> <br />RECEPTIVENESS TO CITIZEN PARTICIPATION/FACILITATING CITIZEN <br /> <br />PARTICIPATION <br /> <br />Citizens need to know how and wh~re they can have input in Council <br />decisions. The Council's citizen participation plan is a first <br />step toward identifying where responsiblity for citizen participation <br />lies. Making this information available to the public should <br />facilitatemore effective public input in Council decisions. <br /> <br />The Council needs to dispel the notion that it is 'elitist.' ll~e <br />Council is perceived as devising only technical solutions to <br />regional problems, thus maintaining itself as the expert on regional <br />issues. Consequently, the 'lay" public is sometimes seen as an <br />intruder into the planning process unlikely to provide useful <br />information. This attitude also affects how the Council deals with <br />the conflict that certain projects naturally generate. If staff <br />feels that technical perfection circumvents conflict, citizen input <br />will be discouraged. <br /> <br />The Council's relationship with local governments needs to be more <br />direct. Council members and staff must go out to con~unities more <br />~ften, rather than relying on written materials or,in-house meetings. <br /> <br /> <br />