Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ac~i~lng the ]~opo~eB ~e~olut. ton. <br /> <br />Motion by Om~ieetoner Dea~er ~ncl ~e~ncleO ~, ~,teelo~s Be~l~en to <br />z~n~ Ci~ ~ei] a~e ~ ~ur~ ~ette~]i~'e r~t for a vari~ <br />to ~e ~atttng or~~ for a ~te~ ~d ~ s~vl~ton of M~ pro~r~ <br />at 8]54 ~st Rv~ ~r~ into 3 ~ots -- 5-~2 acr~, 2-~2 acr~ ~d 2 <br />acres. ~r~er, ~ ~it will ~ fr~ ~e ~nte:line of ~e ~~c on <br />159~ ~ Pl~n9 ~ ~o~n9 ~~~ · 33~ ~,ent ~ a~uir~ on <br />si~ of ~t lt~ for f~ure ~e~ion of ~57~ ~; ~e 1~ eit~:~ nor~ <br />of ~e s~it ~i~ ~1 ~ 2-~2 acres ~n ~ze~ P2~ng ~ ~o~n9 <br />a ~ri~ ~ gr~ to ~e m~ ~:r~t fron~ or~~ for <br />acre ~ot to ~e ~r~; Plan9 ~d ~o~ng r~~ a varl~ ~ gr~ to <br />~e rur~ r~t~n~i~ 10 acre ~i~ z~uir~nt ~ ~e 2-~/2 acre ~d 2 acre <br />lot; Plan9 ~ ~o~ z~~ a v~:i~ ~ g:~:~ to ~e 2-~2 acre <br />~~ lot s~ze z~uir~t for ~e ~ 2 acrel~. ~ ~t of <br /> <br /> r~d ~ 20 acr~. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chaiman Peterson, Ca~ssioners Zin~rman, <br />Dee~er, Bendriksen, Johnson and LaDue. ¥oting 19o: None. Absent: <br />Cc~lissioner Kennen. <br /> <br />Request For Metes And Bounds Subdivision.. Cane of Mr. Dick Ploog: <br /> <br />Ommtission oonsensus, after reviewing the half-section map, is that a metes <br />and bounds subdivision is not necessary as it already is a lot of record. <br /> <br />~ Request For Preliminary_ Planned []nit Develo_rnent Plan Review: <br /> ~an~ Of Northfork Develo_~_nt: <br /> <br />Mr. Gair was present representing the o~ners of Northfork Develolmw. nt. <br /> <br />Mr. Ga/r reviewed with the Ommission the de~elo~t concept that was <br />presented in 3anuar~ plus some aSditional maps which color code the phases of <br />develo~t. <br /> <br />Mr. Gait addressed all points of concern listed in City Engineer letter dated <br />April 2, 1985. <br /> <br />Motion b~ C~ssioner Dcc~er and secDr~ed by Oc~missioner Bendriksen to <br />reccemer~ Council preliminary total o~ncept aplxoval of the West Oaks P.U.D. <br />(formerly knc~n as General Mills property). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Xes: Chairman Peterson, Ommtissioners 2im~erman, <br />Deener, LaDue, Bendriksen and Johnson. Voting ~o: None. Absent: <br />C~ssioner Kennen. <br /> <br />Motion by Ommissioner ~er and seoor~ed by Ommissioner 2i~merman to <br />reammmu~ O~uncil preliminary plat approval of Phase I for the West Oaks <br />P.U.D. contingent upon City Engineer's letter dated April 2, 1985. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: C2~aizmnn Peterson, Ommuissioners ~r, <br />gim~erman, !~nue, Bendriksen and Johnson. Voting No: None. Absent: <br />Oc~ssioner Kennen. <br /> April 2, 1985 <br /> <br />~age 5 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />