Agenda - Council - 04/23/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT BUD SAUTER 1. ~hat Mr. Bud Sauter, hereinafter referred to as 'Applicant," has properly applied for a grading and mining permit to mine fill from his property at the northeast oorner of the intersection of Industry Avenue and Sunfish Lake Boulevard. 2. ~hat the Applicant appeared before the Planning and Zoning Co~,ission for a public hearing pursuant to City Ordinance on April 2, 1985. ~hat said public bearing was properly advertised and minutes of that public hearing are hereby incorporated by refe fence. 3. ~hat the property which is the subject of the application is legally described as follows: ~he Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the following described parcel of land: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence southerly, along the west line thereof, a distance of 360.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land being described; thence easterly, at right angles, a distance of 456.00 feet; thence southerly, at right angles, a distance of 220.00 feet; thence westerly, at right angles, a distance of 456.00 feet,more or less, to the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence nor- therly, along said west line, a distance of 220.00 feet to the point of beginning. 4. ~hat the subject parcel is approximately 37 acres including right-of-way and is located in an I-1 Industrial District. 5. ~hat the Standards for Consideration are as follows: a. ~hat the property is zoned I-1 and mining is not a permitted use in this zone; ~hat the adjoining property to the north contains resi- dential dwellings, and the property to the east, south, and west is either vacant or contains commercial/indus- trial structures; c. ~hat the proposed use may cause a change in the traffic flow to the area; d. ~hat there are no other authorized similar uses in the City of Ramsey; and ~hat the proposed use may not be detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or the general public and may not substantially impair the en- joyment or value of properties in the area.