Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />C~SE ~2: <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br /> <br />Motion carried/failed. Voting yes <br />Voting no ........... <br /> <br />O~DERING 1985 SF~6~X)ATING PROJECTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND <br />SPECIFICATIf~qS: <br /> <br />The following is hereby submitted on this case: <br /> <br />1) Receipt of petition opposing Sealcoating Improvement Projects <br />%85-6 and %85-12 - Enclosure (D2-b) contains petitions that were <br />received against Sealcoating Improvement Projects %85-6 and %85-12. <br />The signatures have been verified and represent more than 50% of the <br />affected property owners in each project, which, by City Charter, <br />precludes the City Council from proceeding with the project as <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Council, by motion should acknowledge receipt of the petition and <br />order it be placed on filed. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Your action will be to receive the petitions. The following proposed <br />motions are hereby submitted for your consideration: <br /> Motion by c~~~and seconded by//~~z4~to'receive <br /> the petition objecting to Sealcoating Improv~nent Project %85-6 <br /> for 161st Avenue ~ and Llama Street NW and to direct City Staff <br /> <br />to place said petition on file. <br />Further discussion: <br /> <br />Motion carried/failed. Voting yes <br />Voting no ~/~x___. . <br /> <br />Motion by nd se~cond.ed to receive <br />the petition objecting to ~eaicoating Improvement Project #85-12 <br />for Sorteberg's Addition and to direct City Staff to place said <br />petition on file. <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br /> <br />Motion carried/failed. <br />Voting no <br /> <br />Voting yes _~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2) Adoption of resolution ordering improv~nents and preparation of <br />plans and specifications for the remainder of the sealcoating <br />projects - The public hearings for the sealcoating improvement <br />projects were held on April 9, 1985. ~uch as the City Charter <br />requires a sixty day waiting period from the date of the public <br />hearing to the date of final action to allc~ for counter petition, no <br />action has been taken on these projects· Since no additional <br />petitions have been received, Council action would be appropriate at <br />this time. <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />