Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Comuission ar~ they forwarded ~ favorable reco~tion to Council. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson arrived at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Gait stated that the other 200 lots p~oposed for development in the first <br />proposal are not even being considered in the proposal at this time; the <br />remaining property will be outlots. <br /> <br />Mr. Gait added that the Park Commission approved the proposal with the <br />understanding that in the first phase of develolm~nt, cash would be paid in <br />lieu of land dedication with maybe one exception -- where Trott Brook oomes <br />close to being coincidental with Northfork's north line boundary. Also, in <br />future developnent, if the developer can show amenities being provided for <br />public use, the developer would request exemption fr~m cash dedication. <br /> <br />George Orning, Vice President for Marketing, Sherburne Homes, stated the homes <br />built in the develotm~nt are targeted for the $90,000 to $130,000 income level; <br />will be energy efficient; not extr~ely large but effectively designed. <br /> <br />Mr. Gait stated that the develoIm~.nt will include association documents and <br />restrictive covenance. <br /> <br />(k~issioner De~mer stated that the developer should be able to choose a name <br />of choice for the develo~m~=_nt's through street and cul-de-sacs off that through <br />street. Streets in the develo~z~ent intended to connect to other Ramsey streets <br />outside the develoIm~=_nt should be named accordingly. <br /> <br />Motion by O~ssioner Deemer and seconded by C~ssioner Zi~me~ to <br />recc~ approval of proposed Findings of Fact 00 for West Oaks P.U.D.; case <br />of Northfork, Inc. (Please refer to findings of fact file for Findings of Fact <br />O0 ). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, C~ssioners Deemer, <br />zi~erman, Hendriksen and Johnson. Voting No: None. Absent: C~ssioners <br />Kennen and LaDue. <br /> <br />Motion by Co~ssioner Deemer to adopt Resolution t85-2 recking that City <br />Council approve the West Oaks Planned Unit Develoim~ent contingent upon <br />Northfork, Inc. and the City entering into a develolm~nt agreement, that the <br />West Oaks sibe is rezoned P.U.D., and that there be a marketable title for the <br />property known as West Oaks P.U.D. Further, to reeo~end that City Council <br />grant variances to Northfork Inc. for the length of the dead end street, street <br />names and street suffi~es. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Commissioner Hendriksen expressed concern with a blanket <br />variance to street names amd suffixes; the street names and suffixes should be <br />subject to Council or Planning and Zoning review in order to insure that a <br />confusing situation is not created for ~mergency vehicles attempting to locate <br />these streets and addresses. <br /> <br />Go~issioner ~cmer amended his motion to include that the selection of street <br />names and suffixes is subject to 911 headquarters approval. <br /> <br />June 4, 1985 <br /> <br />~ge3~6 <br /> <br /> <br />