Laserfiche WebLink
Your action will be to approve/disapprove the preliminary plat of <br /> · Alpaca Estates Third Additlor, only if you have adopted the <br /> Environmental Protectior, Ordinance. The following proposed motion is <br /> <br /> i hereby submitted for ye. ur consideration: __ <br /> Motion, by ~nd seconded b~'"~~ to approve/ <br /> disapprove 'th~ preliminary plat of AlPaca Estates Third <br /> I Additi~r~l . <br /> Furthe ~scussion. ~ ~ <br /> I Motior, ca, tied/failed. Voting yes ~~-~ . <br /> Voting no ~. <br /> <br /> Item B: Complaint Re~ardinQ Mr. Steve Welsh'~ Property on Highway <br /> <br />~ ~ . ~Enclosure (D~-g) contains a letter dated June 12, 1985 from Mr. Nell <br />~ ~..~- Pratt regarding the condition of Mr. Steve Welsh's property located <br /> ~ ~ at 6336 Highway #10 NW. The City has received several other <br />· ~"\~' ,~complaints regarding this property. It also appears that Mr. Welsh <br /> · \.x~Fr ~\is operating a used automobile sales lot from this property without <br /> -- i~%~/~- the property licensing. The City notified Mr. Welsh of these <br /> ~ ~'~.~ complaints and that he was in violation of the City's nuisance <br />· ~j~ ordinance. Mr. Welsh responded that he was in the process of <br />~ ~ ,l c~eaning up the property and applying for a license from the City to <br /> ~j~ell automobiles. <br />I ~~~ouncil ~tion: <br /> I~ Your action and response to Mr. Pratt's letter will be based on your <br /> discussio~ of this matter. <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />Review of Jarvis Street NW Matter Relatin~ to Northfork <br /> <br />Development .Agreement; Case of North Fork, Inc. <br /> <br />City Staff will have further information regarding the amount of the <br />developer's participation in the expense of upgrading Jarvis Street <br />NW available at the meeting. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />No action is necessary. This item is provided for your information. <br /> <br />CASE #5: ENGINEERING: <br /> <br />Item A: Consideration of 167th Avenue NW: <br /> <br /> At this <br />,t act <br /> <br />This ite~ was brought before Council on several different occasions <br />as well as at the regular meeting of Nay 28, 1985. At that meeting, <br />Council tabled this issue until the next regular meeting and directed <br />the City Attorney and Councilmember Cox to contact the Hunts and <br />report back. <br /> <br />writing, they have not had the opportunity to make that <br />and have advised us that if they do, they will have a ~eport <br /> <br /> <br />