Laserfiche WebLink
10. That the Subject Property is 80 feet deficient of the 200 foot lot width requirement established in <br /> City Code. <br /> <br />11. That the City has previously granted similar variances. <br /> <br />12. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the R-1 Residential Rural <br /> Developing District. <br /> <br />14. That the granting of the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that are denied <br /> by this Chapter to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Chapter or <br /> other property in the same zone. <br /> <br />17. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />18. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values within the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />19. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion in public streets. <br /> <br />20. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member <br />Johnson, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereofi <br /> <br /> Chairperson N ixt <br /> Board Member Johnson <br /> Board Member Jeffrey <br /> Board Member Shepherd <br /> Board Member Van Scoy <br /> Board Member Watson <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br /> None <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br /> None <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #04-06-139 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />