Laserfiche WebLink
other th~ ~' ~b~b ~J~ })rooks. <br /> <br />their Dusines~ in the &r~ o/ the airport thereby p~ovldlng & 9laoe fox <br />t~ar~ient traific to mpet~ their <br /> <br />Citizen- Is this Ocr~ira~ion for or agairu~t the airpvrt? I get the fe~JLn9 <br />this Camis~ton want~ the airport regarcl2ess of what the people wa~t. <br /> <br />Citizen - Written c~lrents subrittecl to the O~m~ri~ion in favor cf ~e ~r~rt <br />were fr~ pilots ~t ~ ~t live In ~. ~ ~y ]et~rs ~d ~is <br />~i~ion re~ive fr~ ~i~en ~ng to ~e ~eir ~i~ ~ <br />f~le~ to ~? <br /> <br />Citizen - Wiry did air traffic at Gateway decrease over the years7 <br /> <br />C~ainvan Ippel replied that the decrease in traffic was due to the econc~d, gas <br />prioes and type cf operation; the eoor~my is getting better and the type cf <br />aircraft Gateway ~uld ac~odate is bec~in <br /> <br />O~issioner Stauffe~ ~oted that the ~inutes of this O~ission's ~tings sho~ <br />that this ~ission is ~aking every attempt to be objective. <br /> <br /> Om~issioner Greenberg stated that he c~airs the Econ~ic Develolm~ent <br />m Omvmission and it's is to bring industrial and c~mmercial deve/oA=hent <br /> to Ramsey. (Im~issioner Greenberg stated that he was involved when Ra~ was <br /> <br /> a ~p; it was realized that residential d~elo~m~t only %~ould result in <br />m unaffordable ta~s and 1400 acres was set aside for industrial ~evelol~ent. <br /> O~n~issioner Greenber9 stated that the tax~s on his business are $90/day and <br /> <br />many other b~imsss are al~ ~ying at that rate; ~st cf that ~ney gc~s to <br /> <br />m the school district. ~he raoe for cxmm~ercial and industrial develot2vent <br /> in Minnesota in order to ease the tax load and the only thing Ra~sey can ~ onis <br /> <br />that 1400 acr~. (~air~ Gr~nberg i~guired as to what ~uld be <br /> <br />m dor~ for the residents of Safety Zone B with regards to subdividing in order to <br /> be able to afford asses~_nts. <br /> <br />m <br />m <br />m <br /> m <br /> m <br /> <br />~issioner $ieber stated that this Cc-~vission o~uld make r~tions to <br />(2Duncil but Oouncil is not obligated to follc~ those r~tions. <br /> <br />fk~r~vissioners Dov~van and Sieber stated that the~ feel it is time to vote on <br />whether or not to r~ Comcil adopt the Airport Master Plan. <br /> <br />~issioner Stauffer stated he thinks there are issues that need further <br />discussion. <br /> <br />Motion by Om~issioner $ieber to r~ to City Oomcil that all <br />oonsiderations of and work toaards a municiIm/ airport be ~topped until and <br />unless significant interest by the residents of R~ is dmmonstrated. <br /> September 3, 1985 <br /> <br />~ge5 ~7 <br /> <br />m <br /> <br /> <br />