Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />! <br /> <br />Motion by O~wissioner Hardin and seoonded Dy __0~_ issioner Wagner to Bend the <br />motion reocm~per~ng Co~cil er~rse the Airport Master Plan Dy including that <br />the endorsement lxovide for a reassessvent of site locations and pursuing <br />participation with other cities. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: __Corm_ isstoner Vevea stated that studyin9 other sites has <br />already been done in Ramsey; the City is at a point r~w of makin9 a decision as <br />to whether or not to continue to study this particular location; the ~rend~ent <br />on the floor would reverse progress. <br /> <br />~venOrent failed. <br /> <br />C(m~issio~er s DeLu .ca, <br />Greenberg. Absent. <br /> <br />Voting Yes: (~issioners Wagner and Hardin. <br /> Fults, Kurak, Vevea a~d Muller. Abstain: <br /> (k~missioner Miller. <br /> <br />Voting No.. <br />~ain~an <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />Motion Dy Gommissioner Debuca and seconded by __fN~m_ issioner Kurak to amend the <br />motion recanvending Cot~cil endorse the Airport Master Plan by including a <br />request that Got~cil consider requiring that the Plan researc~ the possibility <br />of other city participation. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: C~.issio~er Fults stated that be would be in favor of <br />sending a letter to the Airport Go, mission requesting that they pursue the <br />possibility of other city participation. Mr. Jack Ippel stated that pursuing <br />other city participation is really a responsibility of the Airport O~pmission. <br /> <br />;m~ndment c~rried. Voting Yes: __Oc~missioners Wagner, ~ardin, DeLuca, Fults, <br />Kurak, Ve~ea and Muller. Voting No: None. Abstain: (~airman Greenberg. <br />Absent: (~issioner Miller. <br /> <br />Case ~: Discussion Reg_ardin9 R _e~uest Fr~ Ai _rport ~ission ~gardtgg <br /> Feasibility_ Of Utilizing_ Tax Increment Financin~ For _b~gradigg <br /> <br />__Oc~missiormr ltardin stated that Ms. Waelti ba~ said that it is feasible to use <br />tax increment to develop the airport but the City would have to bond for the <br />dollars up front, whic~ would be true for any tax increment Ixoject; <br />development must take place in that area in a relatively short ~ot~t of time <br />in order for the City to recoup it's dollars. <br /> <br />Mr. Ippel stated that the intent of the Airport Qlvmission, in their <br />recca~endation that a tax incrm~.nt project area be established consisting of <br />the industrial park and land that would be acquired for airport develoll~ent, <br />was to insure that tax incremmt dollars fr~ that area would be available for <br />airport develola~-nt should the airport become a municipal facility. ~aose tax <br />increment dollars would not be restricted to airport develol~pent and could be <br />used for sewer and water, for instance, if the airport did not become a <br />reality. <br /> <br />Case ~2.- Discussion Reg_arding Ms~bership In A~oka County_ Chamber of <br /> (k~merce And/Or Anoka Area ~r Of (k~meroe; <br /> <br />Mr. Tc~ Srm_ll and Mr. John Norlincjer of A~oka Ootmty (/k~pber of (k~merce were <br />present requesting Ramsey joint that organization. <br /> <br />Sept~ber 11, 1985 <br /> <br />~3of4 <br /> <br /> <br />