Laserfiche WebLink
CoL~ci~r~be~ <br />of fac~ ~ <br /> <br />the adoption of the following findings <br /> <br />FINDINSS OF FACT <br /> ROY N~GO~ <br /> <br />]. That the Applicant has applied for Board of Adjustment <br />variances to construct an accessory structure larger than allowed <br />by City Oode and to construct the p~oposed accessory structure in <br />the front yard. <br /> <br />2. That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment <br />for a public hearing on August 27, 1985, and that said public <br />hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said <br />public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these <br />findings by reference. <br /> <br />3. That the Applicant's property is generally known as 16431 <br />Dysprosiu~ Street N.W. and is located in the R-1 Residential <br />District. <br /> <br />4. That the subject property is approximately 1.5 acres in size. <br /> <br />5. That the Applicant's request is to construct a 26' x 30' <br />accessory structure with a total area of 780 square feet. <br /> <br />6. ~hat the City Code restricts the total square footage of an <br />accessory structure to 624 square feet on parcels of land less <br />than 2-1/2 acres. <br /> <br />7. That the Applicant's request is to construct the proposed <br />accessory structure in the front yard. <br /> <br />8. That the City Code requires that all detached accessory <br />structures be located in the side or rear yards. <br /> <br />9. That the Applicant has stated that due to the topography of <br />the lot, there are exceptional, unique or extraordinary <br />circumstances or conditions applying to that property which do <br />not apply generally to other properties in the R-1 Residential <br />District. <br /> <br />10. That the variances may be necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that <br />possessed by other properties in the R-1 Residential District and <br />in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased financial <br />return shall not in itself be dee~ed sufficient to warrant a <br />variance. <br /> <br />11. That the authorization of such variances will not be of <br />substantial detriment to adjacent properties and will not <br />materially impair the intent or purpose of this ordinance or the <br />public interest. <br /> <br /> <br />