Laserfiche WebLink
4: <br /> Matthew Petitclair i <br /> 9111 Muirfield Cir NW <br /> Ramse , MN 55303 <br /> p <br /> December 7, 2016 <br /> City Council <br /> City of Ramsey <br /> Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> i <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT ON DOMESTICATED ANIMAL LICENSE FOR <br /> 15830 ANDRIE STREET <br /> I am writing in response to the City's request for public comment on the subject <br /> license which will be discussed at the Council meeting on December 13, 2016. <br /> My residence is located across the street (Muirfield Circle) and immediately North <br /> of the Harer's residence. I was totally unaware of the presence of the animal until <br /> k' <br /> recently when the issue was raised. In fact, to this day I have never seen, <br /> smelled or heard anything to alert me to the presence of said pig. <br /> Consequently, I have no objection to the presence of ONE potbelly pig in my <br /> neighbor's home. Furthermore, I can see no basis for anyone else to object <br /> based on an objective assessment of the current situation. <br /> You should be aware of an ongoing disagreement of epic proportions between <br /> the Harers and the Northfork Homeowners Association Board of Directors <br /> regarding the presence of chickens at this property. To date, this conflict has <br /> involved personal acrimony, lawyers, contact with the Ramsey Police, surveys, <br /> neighborhood-wide mailings, and door-to-door campaigning. Nevertheless, to <br /> my knowledge, the Harers are in compliance with applicable Ramsey ordinances <br /> on the raising of chickens. Consequently, my advice to the Council is to stay as �. <br /> far away from the Great Northfork Chicken Debate as possible. But you should <br /> consider how this other matter may color the comments of some Northfork <br /> e <br /> residents, especially the Board Members. <br /> Please feel free to contact me directly if there are any comments or questions. <br /> Yours Truly, <br /> i <br /> i <br />