Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION #16-12-240 <br /> A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0975 RELATING TO A REQUEST <br /> FROM EDIE HARER TO MAINTAIN A POT-BELLIED PIG AT THE PROPERTY <br /> LOCATED AT 15830 ANDRIE ST NW. <br /> WHEREAS, Edie Harer, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant," has properly applied <br /> for a Non-Traditional Animal License to maintain a pot-bellied pig on the property generally <br /> known as 15830 Andrie St NW and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 4, Block 4,Northfork Links Addition,Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> ("Subject Property") <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THIS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> RAMSEY,ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA that the findings of fact relating to <br /> the request are determined to be as follows: <br /> 1. That the Applicant appeared before the City Council pursuant to Section 10-1(e) of the <br /> Ramsey City Code on December 13, 2016. <br /> 2. That the Subject Property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development). Surrounding <br /> properties are also zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development). <br /> 3. That the Subject Property is approximately 1.96 acres in size and surrounding properties <br /> are similar in size. <br /> 4. That keeping of a Non-Traditional or Exotic Animal is permissible with the issuance of a <br /> Non-Traditional Animal License (the "License") as outlined in City Code Section 10-1. <br /> 5. That on November 14, 2016, the Applicant submitted an application requesting a License <br /> to maintain a Vietnamese Pot-Bellied Pig (the "Pig") on the Subject Property. <br /> 6. That the Pig is already being maintained on the Subject Property without a License. <br /> 7. That the Applicant also maintains eight(8) chickens (hens) on the Subject Property. <br /> 8. That the Subject Property is part of a Home Owner's Association (HOA), which may have <br /> more restrictive standards than City Code if it so chooses; however, the City has no role in <br /> enforcing these private covenants and they should not be considered when processing a <br /> License request. <br /> 9. That if the HOA has more stringent provisions governing the keeping of and/or maintaining <br /> animals on parcels, the HOA would be the responsible entity to legally enforce those <br /> provisions. <br />