Laserfiche WebLink
CASE 3: <br /> <br />foot lot width. There is a real problem to CARSON ltomes on bow <br />this subdivision came about and they will explain. They have <br />been before the Planning Commission and their findings and <br />recommendations are submitted for your review. The following <br />enclosures are submitted for your review: <br /> <br />a) Enclosure (D4-h) Planning Commission minutes dated <br />February 5, 1979. <br />b) Enclosure (D4-i) contains proposed metes and bounds plat. <br /> <br />Co~ents: ~e Board of Adjustments only concern will be to lot <br />variance. However, Council will have to approve or disapprove <br />the subject plat in .separate action. <br /> <br />VARIANCE OF LOT SIZE IN TRANSITIONAL AREA; GAT~AY NORTH <br /> <br />INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT #2 <br /> <br />This plat contains one acre lots and according to ordinance re- <br />quirements they should be 2~ acre lots. This was brought up to <br />Council at the Council meeting of February 12, 1979. (Please <br />refer to enclosure (A-l). <br /> <br /> <br />