My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/26/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 02/26/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:36:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2004 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/26/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,innesola Deparlmenl of l,,laturol Resou~ces~ <br />'' ' .Ot Walers <br /> <br /> Pat. Olson <br /> Hydrologist, Land Use <br /> (612) 2'96- 0445 <br /> <br /> 3rd Floor Space Center <br /> 444 tafayelte Road <br /> St. Paul, Minnesota .55101 <br /> <br /> OF NATURAL <br />IBUILDING ' ST. PAUL,,, <br /> <br /> RESOURCES <br />MINNESOTA · 55155 <br /> <br /> DNR INFORMATION <br /> (612) 296-6157 <br /> <br />February ]6, 1979 <br /> <br />Mr. William K. Goodrich <br />Weaver~ Talle & Herrich Law Offices <br />316 East Main Street <br />Anoka, Minnesota 33303 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Goodrich: <br /> <br />Th~ Department of Natural Resources has completed the review of the Grosslein <br />project as requested. As Ramsey does not have aWild and Scenic River ordinance, <br />we do not have the authority to approve or disapprove uses within the recreational <br />land-use district, we can only make suggestions. The EQB and State Planning <br />Agency have the state monitoring and review authority as per Critical Areas <br />designation. <br /> <br />There are three reasons why the DNR will not oppose the project: <br /> 1. The area proposed for this development is already heavily commercialized, <br /> thus the proposed project would be relatively consistent with prior <br /> development; <br /> <br /> 2. The project would not be visible from the river; and, <br /> <br /> 3. There has been sufficient provisions taken for timiting runoff to a minimum. <br /> <br />However, I have some reservations in regard to the potential conflicts which may <br />occur with the adjacent residential areas. The increase in truck traffic on <br />Tungsten Street (the only entrance and exit for Rivelyn Avenue) to and from the <br />new facility could pose a safety hazard for the residents along RJvelyn Avenue. In <br />addition, the new facility, during the construction phase and during actual <br />operations~ would increase the noise and nuisance levels fo.r the residents. <br /> <br />I offer some suggestions which may help to alJevJate the above problems, if the <br />building permit and/or variance are issued: <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Grosslein could try to obtain a road easement, perhaps from the <br />International Mobil dea]er~ to create a by-pass for the trucks to use. The <br />by-pass could enter the loading area via the International dealer's entrance <br />and continue along the east side of the proposed facility. I~ this in not <br />feasible, then the road should be upgraded by Grosslein and a turn-around <br />area large enough for trucks should be established away from Tungsten <br />Street. <br /> <br />Bream may be placed along the west side of both lots utilized by Grosslein. <br />In addition the bream be landscaped. Also the landscaping along the west <br />and south sides of the new facility be a heavier and densier cover ol spruce~ <br />juniper etc. than suggested in the site plan to aid in eliminating noise <br />generated by operations. This would also serve to make the project more <br />aesthetically amenable to the residents. <br /> <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.