My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/09/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 04/09/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:36:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 10:49:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/09/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: Building Official <br /> <br />RE: Automatic Sprinkler for Grosslein Building <br /> <br />DATE: March 28, 1979 <br /> <br />As previously discussed with you, it is my opinion, that the proposed <br />Grosslein building cannot, according to the State Building Code, be <br />constructed without an automatic sprinkler system. Chapter 38 states <br />no portion of the building shall be more than 75 feet from an approved <br />opening readily accessible to the fire department. <br /> <br />To date I have not received plans for the structure, but have been in- <br />formed the dimensions are 175 feet by 190 feet. If these dimensions <br />are correct it is my interpretation that they could not comply. <br /> <br />However, as you recall, we recently addressed a similar issue with <br />the addition at Mate Punch and Die. In their case we required addi- <br />tional fire extinguishers, an alarm system and a statement that an <br />approved sprinkler system would be installed within thirty days after <br />city water becomes available. <br /> <br />In view of past actions it would be my recommendation that a similar <br />variance be granted to Mr. Grosslein. I have based this recommendation <br />on the following: <br /> <br />1) The Grosslein building is similar in size to only the Mate punch <br />and Die addition. Therefore, the result is a reduced fire hazard. <br /> <br />2) The proposed use of the structure poses a minimal fire hazard. <br />Far less than that which exists at Mate Punch and Die. <br /> <br />So no precedent is set, and other situations similar to this are surely <br />going to arise, I feel each situation in the future should be judged <br />on its individual merits. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.