My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/14/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 05/14/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:37:42 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 11:18:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/14/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rec <br />A~ <br /> <br /> Council Meeting <br />23:. !9.79, P,~ge 1'0' <br /> <br />sign across it and charge 25¢ to everyone using the road. And, now to get <br />assessed for this road also, he doesn't know why he should have to be burdened <br />on top of blacktopping his own development. He wishes he would have known <br />about this before. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec asked Street Superintendent Mevissen if the Street Department would <br />be able to grade and gravel this road. <br /> <br />Mevissen stated that it depends on how much dirt there is to move. <br /> <br />Counci)lman Cox questioned where the City wou)d get the money ~o:improve the <br />road in the future since it is doubtful that there will be anymore development <br />in that area. <br /> <br />Councilman Reimann said it could be done by petition, he doesn't feel the <br />City should pay any of it. <br /> <br />Councilman Mickelson questioned how the road could be engineered to match <br />up with the other improved roads if it was done later. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said Dr. Anderson of White Pines although he did not .agree <br />at first, has expressed how glad he'is that he'blacktopped'his development <br />because it has made his property much more ~aluable.' ~ <br /> <br />Mrs. Hanson said if their property is assessed forltiiis road it will make <br />it so valuable that they won't be able to afford to keep' it. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec polled the Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Councilman Sorteberg said he is not in favor of'any of the. five alternatives <br />suggested in the Engineer's report. <br /> <br />Councilman Reimann is'not in favor and feels the @rQject'should be'dropped. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox said, the project should proceed in some manner but he. is not ~ <br />necessarily in favor of any of the five alternatives. <br /> <br />Councilman Mickelson feels the project should proceed in some reasonable manner, <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec feels the project should be accomplished, but some other al;t-ernative <br />should be worked out for financing. <br /> <br />Councilman Cox added that one of the reasons for having a statutory city was to <br />avoid this type of situation. When the Council sees a need for something they <br />should take the initiative and get the job done. This is the reason fo'r govern~ <br />ment structure and it is probably the first time this Council has been faced <br />with a situation like this. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Reimann and seconded by Councilman Cox to table this issue <br />until May 14, 1979 to look for another alternative for financi.ng. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmen Cox, Mickel. son~ Reimann <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.