Laserfiche WebLink
5/7/79 <br /> <br />Item'#3, Arthur St;'Hilaire <br />Mm. Hilaime wished a Special .use permit to repair cars in a residential <br />garage at 15428 Nowthen Blvd. Mm. Hilalre Stated that if the only concern <br />of the neighbors was visibility of the site, he would be building a two or <br />three car gamage elsewhere onthe property and would be working on mostly <br />curment models with an occasional older'w~ecked cap. Mm. St. Hilaire <br />stated that he didn't want to fom&e anything on'anyone, but that he has <br />never had complaints from his present neighbors. It was pointed out to <br />Mr. St. Hilaire that he would have neighboms just as close here as he does at <br />his present location. <br /> <br />Ken Peterson asked fop commission comment, and Mm. Dunn stated that he feels <br />the City has enough of this type of'business in residential areas, and they <br />have found out that gmanting c.u.p, just doesn't work citing an example <br />on Hematite Street which has caused concern to the City. Kathy Schneider <br />stated that it would be too'hard to Set conditions which would cover all the <br />possible pmoblems which could amiss. <br />MotiQn by Art Dunn, seconded by Gerry Zimmerman to recommend to the City Council <br />to deny the request of Mm. St. Hilaime for'a C. U. P. at 15428 Nowthen Blvd. <br />due to the following findings of'fact: <br />1.) The amea is currently zoned R-1. <br />2.) The pamcel involved'is extremely open and exposed to the adjacent property <br /> ownems view'without natupal screening and artifical scmeening would detract <br /> from the area. <br />3.) Accomding to Mm. St. Hilaire there is noticeable noise and long hours. <br /> Motion cammied 7-0. <br /> <br />Item #4 William Proft - Home Occupation Permit Discussion <br /> <br />Mm. Proft was present to ask the Commissions feelings on his request fop <br />a special use permit to operate a one man sign business out of a garage <br />on Hwy #10 (8964) . Mr. Proft was advised to request a Public Hearing if <br />he desired to proceed and if possible have pictures of present site and <br />any information regarding present neighbors additude. <br /> <br />Item #5. Ed Klemish Proposed'subdivision <br />Mm. Klemish was present with'a revised sketch plan of a proposed development <br />Adjacent to Shady Lawn Estates on the Nomth. Mr. 'Richamd Cich, 6440 170th N.W <br />stated that he was opposed to Mm. Klemish not meeting the 2.5 acme lot size <br />requimement and that he didn't feel rheim roads could handle the extra traffic. <br />Ken Peterson stated that this was not a Public Hearing and that now Mm. Klemish <br />would be aware of their concerns. <br /> <br />Kathy Schneider stated that this was not close enough to the P & Z Commissions <br />original recommendation of consideming lots that were close to the 2.5 acre <br />requirement. Mr. Jeff Cains stated that this sketch was close to what the <br />Council had recommended. Peter Raatikka stated that the Council had told <br />M~. Klemish that they would like to see total density of 2.5 acres. <br /> <br />Mm. APt Dunn questioned who came up with the 2.5 acre density factom for this <br />plat pointing out that the developems of Tiemra Estates would pmobably have <br />benefitted fmom the same and where does the Commission dmaw the line. <br /> <br />Mm. Klemish replied that this was a special situation since the City wanted <br />pamk land along the brook~ Gerry Zimme~man stated that if we give a variance <br />in this case, we will be hard p~essed to turm others down. <br /> <br /> <br />