Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilman Mickelson and seconded by Councilman Sorteberg to <br />approve the preliminary 5-year capital improvement program as presented <br />by the Park Commission. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Minkelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />Motion ~ Councilman Mickelso% seconded by Councilman Sorteberg to authorize <br />the Park Commission to apply for the Lawcon Grant and to submit the application <br />itself. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Mickelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />OAKRIDGE ESTATES'FINAL PLAT'FOR APPROVAL <br /> <br />Mr. Lund appeared before the Council in regard to this plat. <br /> <br />Discussion was held on Item No. 3 of the City Engineer~!.s Report dated <br />June 21, 1979 regarding street grades along Ferret Street and 163m~ Avenue <br />being revised to match the proposed construction of 161st Avenue and Llama <br />Street. <br /> <br />The I.City's B~itding Official is to check each lot before issuing permits <br />for City code compliance. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Mickelson and seconded by Councilman Sorteberg to approve <br />the final plat of Oakridge Estates contingent that the plat conforTM with <br />the Engineer's Report dated June 21, 1979, all items specified]being met and <br />a marketable title determined by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Mickelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />0N-SALE'LIQUOR.'LICENSE'FOR'DE'ZIEL,S~SUPPER-CLUB <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Sorteberg and SeConded by Councilman Mickelson to <br />approve the license for Mr. George DeZiel, DeZiel's Supper Club.for on- <br />sale intoxicating liquor and Sunday liquor~ <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen MickelSon <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />.S~PER~O~L;'INCORPORATED'ON-SALE'LIQUOR LICENSE <br /> <br />Discussion held regarding the 60/40 requirement of the City Code on food <br />and liquor and the faot that Superbowl has been in operation~only seven months. <br />Council directed that a letter be sent to Superbowl, Inc., informing them <br />that council is going to review the 60/40 requirement as required by law <br />and consider if the 60/40 requirement could be changed to.be based on the <br />amount of'the investment instead of'the amoUnt of.food business. <br /> <br />Regular Council .Meeting <br /> June 25; 1~79 <br /> Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />