Laserfiche WebLink
General Contract -79-132 <br /> <br />Adam Construction <br />15515 University Avenue NE <br />Anoka <br /> <br />79-133 <br /> <br />Excavation 79-130 <br /> <br />Jim Miller Construction <br />Box 1228 <br />St. Cloud <br />Kober Excavating <br />18575 Sin~onet D~ive <br />Elk River <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Mickelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />MEETING NOTICE FACILITY PLANNING STUDY <br /> <br />Engineer Dick Sha indicated that he will be at'the meeting representing <br />Metro Waste Control. The entire 201 planning process is finished through <br />federal g~ant and it is important that elected officials know what is going on. <br /> <br />Councilman Mickelson asked Mr. Sha how close they are to approving the <br />sewer designations. <br /> <br />Engineer Sha said the hearing on all of this is scheduled in March of 1980 <br />and all of.~he plans are tied together. The Anoka portion~ they are trying <br />to fund for'1980, remainder by 1984. If the Anoka plant stays in operation <br />as it is, or expanded to the limits of the ~ite, it lookAslike even expanding <br />to ~he site, that part of the w~stef~om'this area will have to go down <br />through Champlin/Brooklyn Park. The MWWC owns the Anoka plant-not Anoka. <br />Regarding the question of sewer capacity at Anoka, what level of t~eatment <br />they had, rCA decreed that secondary treainnent is all thgy have to be planned <br />for, <br /> <br />'RECEIVING:AND.'ACCEPTING'BIDS'FOR'STREETIMPROVEMENT PROJECT <br /> <br />Engineer Sha noted Engineer Raatikka's letter dated June 25, .979 <br />regarding the bids received for'thA follOwing projects: 79-3, 79-~ and 79-5. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilman Mickelson and seconded by Councilman Sorteberg to Adopt <br />Resolution No. ?9-49 Accepting the Bid of NDH IncorPorated for a total <br />base bid of $178,914.00. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmen Mickelson <br />and Sorteberg. Voting no: None. <br /> <br />Discussion was held on the costs and the fact that the City has no resources <br />for doing the restoration. <br /> <br />VARIOLITE'STREET'IMPROVEMENT~PROJECT:No. '79-2 <br /> <br />A petition from the property owners was presented requesting an Environmental <br />Impact Statement. <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the .City legally has no obligation to respond <br />to this petition but has taken it upon' themselves to save the berm. Further, <br />that the City would not want to commit itself to doing environmental impact <br />statements each time something is done, there are some nice trees involved in <br /> <br />Regular Council Meeting <br /> June 25,1979 <br /> <br /> <br />