My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1979
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1979
>
Agenda - Council - 07/23/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:38:41 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 2:25:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/23/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P & Z -3- <br />10/3/77 <br /> <br /> and there has been conflict, they are planning on relocating. The <br /> dogs have been shown by their children for the last three years <br /> as a hobby. Their request is for a temporary permit until they <br />.move to prevent violation of the City Ordinance. Mr. Ken Wagner, <br /> 8410 156th N.W., stated his comolaint was of their collie barking <br /> during t~e day and two goats'which are kept on the property. <br /> Mr. Wagner asked exactly how many animals there were on the premises. <br /> Mrs. Nannie explained they had 8 dogs, 2 kittens, 2 goats, and <br /> puppies for a total of 17 animals. Mr. Robert Stelling-8421 156th <br /> Avenue explained his complaint was with the collie barking during <br /> the day. M~s. Nannie assured him that they have taken care of the <br /> problem. M~s. Stelling asked how soon they planned on moving and Mrs. <br /> Mannie said they would be moving as soon as possible and that their <br /> house was already listed with a realtor. Mrs. Bill Aydt, 14964 Nowthe~ <br /> Boulevard stated that she wasn't familiar with this particular situ- <br /> ation, but sympathized with families who moved to Ramsey because <br /> of raising animals and then were forced to move by increasing <br /> population. N~. Wagner asked what they were going to do about the <br /> goats and Ers. Mannie said the goats would be keDt in the backyard. <br /> Art Dunn explained that both the Nannies and their neighbors had <br /> certain rights and hoped a suitable agreement could be reached. <br /> Mss. Nannie explained that the dogs are kept inside at night and <br /> the neighbors agreed that there wasn't a problem with barking <br /> at night. During the day the dogs are kept in 4 runs with~2 dogs <br /> Der run. Public hearing closed. <br /> <br />Motion by Art Ddnn, seconded by Jerry Zimmerman to recommend to <br />the City Council to grant, a Conditional Use Permit for a Private <br />Kennel license to Paul and Lucy Mannie, 8401 156th Avenue N.W. <br />for 8 dogs for a period of time not to exceed six months-with ~the <br />condition that the dogs are kenneled or restrained during the day <br />and kept in the house at night. 6 - 0 <br /> <br />~ifi'-.~.-~ William Aydt,h~.re~U~st~for~~rezOn~ng7 <br />M~'[~&'Mrs.. Ay_dt were~pres~nt~..to explain their plans for an <br />R'd'di'tfon"and ..fiXing up the inside of~his building with later <br />remodelin~g the exterior to complement ~the-house- Mrs. AVdt-~ <br />explained that they were concerned abgut.?eing able to rebuild-: <br />in~ the.levent their, present-facilities were ever completely dest~oyed. <br /> <br />A1 Sorteberg said that he was aware that this request had been' <br />made at' least two years ago. Motion bY Ron West, seconded by 'Ken <br />Peterson to recommend to.the-City Council that.~he William Aydt <br />property, 14964 Nowthen'Bo~levard be changed in the Urban Planning <br />District Study from UR tO UMB rezoning.; T~ reason being the pro- <br />perty is an established business and should have~een included 'in <br />the Plan.'- 6 --0 -. <br /> <br /> Item 5. .Raynold Sanderson &' Jim Kapoelhoff, variance request. ~ <br /> <br /> Mr. Howard Triggs and Mz. Raynold Sanderson were present to request <br /> a variance to enable Mz. & Mrs. KappelhOff to build a house on a <br /> piece of property without frontage on a public road and a proposed <br /> access of 66 foot private easement of o'ver 1/4 mile long. In dis- <br /> cussion members of the Planning & Zoning Co~ission explained the <br />problems of this type of access to Mr. Triggs, Mr. Sanderson and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.