Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />gross terms the costs of increases in population for the four <br />commuJ~[ties involved in the study. This data is very general <br />in nature and should be refined considerably before it is used <br />as a basis for specific planning and staging within the City <br />of Ramsey. One key point involved in the Wisconsin study which <br />was used as a base is data which indicates that the most <br />expensive form of urban development around a metropolitan <br />area is the form which consists of 2-1/2 acre lots. <br /> <br /> The data provided in the .study report for the City of <br />Ramsey indicates that capital facilities to serve the increased <br />population projected through 1990 is slightly less than $4 million. <br />It also indicates that operational costs for the City of Ramsey <br />are anticipated to increase by approximately 183% over that <br />time period. This compares to estimated increases for the City <br />of Anoka of 138%; Brooklyn Park, 249%; and the City of Champlin, <br />280%. None of this data appears to adequately discuss the <br />increased valuation which would result from the development <br />anticipated as a result of extension of sewer facilities. <br /> <br /> The following information on industrial and domestic flows <br />forecast indicates the basic assumptions used for projecting <br />interceptor flow from the City of Ramsey: <br /> <br />1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 <br /> <br />Total <br />Flows <br />(MGD) <br /> <br /> Population <br />?otal Employment <br />Industrial Emp. <br />Industrial Acreage <br />Industrial Flow MGD <br />Domestic Flow MGD <br /> <br />2,727 7,750 <br />102 150 <br /> <br />9,000 10,300 16,500 25,800 34,200 <br />300 800 1,650 5,160 8,550 <br />60 160 330 1,032 1,710 <br />6 16 33 103 171 <br />.03 .08 .17 .5 .9 <br />· 9 1.0 1.7 2.6 3.4 <br /> <br />4.3 <br /> <br />Industrial Flows Forecast <br /> <br />Employment Rate <br />Percent Industrial <br />Employment Density <br /> <br />26.74 51.67 <br />.20 .20 <br />10 10 <br /> <br />30.0 13.13 10.0 5.00 4.00 <br />.20 .20 .20 .20 .20 <br />10 10 10 t0 10 <br /> <br />NOTE: <br /> <br />Employment rate = total population <br /> total employment <br /> <br />Employment density = total number of industrial employees <br /> per acre of developed industrial land <br /> <br />Percent industrial = percent of total employment employed <br /> within the industrial sector <br /> <br />- 4 - <br /> <br /> <br />