Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />,i <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />Planning activities which have influenced patterns of development in Ramsey Township <br />essentially began with the ,1968 planning study prepared by the North~A~noka Planning <br />~.eague..While generalized in terms of recommending use areas, the plan was relatively <br />specific concerning the types of uses that should be encouraged within these broad <br />confines. The major emphasis of the plan in Ramsey was for extensive residential <br />neighborhoods. The land areas close to Anoka and a'long the Rum River were recom~ <br />mended for urban density development including single family dwellings on 10,000 <br />to 15,000 square foot lots, mobile homes and apartments, all to:be se ~ryed by public, <br />sewer and water facilities. Suburban andestate densities were recommended generally <br />south of Trott Brook. This classification was to be developed in half acre lot sub- <br />divisions served by sewer and water. Low or rural density and greenbelt areas were <br />recommended generally north of Trott Brook. The lot sizes recommended ranged between <br />three and five acres in order to_protect agricultural values within the region. In add~ition <br />there were some detailed recommendations for apartment~and commercial development <br />along through Highways 10 and 52 as well as a relatively large industrial park along the <br />north side of the railroad and through Highway 10 between Anoka and Ramsey Boulevard. <br /> <br />Of all these recommendations the only one to be followed in principle was the last. <br />While it is true that the remaining area has been devoted primarily to.residential use, <br />no distinction was made between urban and rural densities. Every lot within the <br />township was required to De one acre in size, and capable of being redivided later <br />into two segments or building lots once, sewer and water facitities ~ecome available. <br />As indicated in the study of existing land use, the result of this general policy has <br />been the development of scattered subdivision platS at the four corners of the township <br />as well as a concentrated'cluster of pl~ts at the. center. A major emphasis of the <br />planning study has been to re-evaluate a differentiation~ in residential densities and <br />to recognize the limitations that natural features-place on all development potential. <br /> <br />Recent efforts of the Metropolitan Council-have shown a similar emphasis particularly <br />with the publication of the Metropolitan DeveloPment Guide Open-Space Policy Plan, <br />Program. The recommended open-space plan for the Metropolitan Area is di~vided' into <br />protection open space and recreation open space. In'Ramsey Township the protection <br />open-space is concerned with soils which have severe, limitations for urban development, <br />erodible slopes, wetlands and flood plain areas. Like the more detailed, information <br />reproduced in the background section of this report the soils limitations were based <br />on Soil Conservation Services studies which identified areas with patterns of particularly <br />slow drainage. They include soils whicl~ are likely to contribute to expensive construc- <br />tion due to special needs like artificial drainage and site stabilization to prevent struc- <br />tural damage. In addition, on-site sewer absorption systems are frequently ineffective <br />and where public sewerage facilities -are possible, construction-is likely to be.more <br />expensive. The design of all facilities in these areas must compensate for the soil <br />problems. Erodible slopes constitute a less significant problem within the township <br />as they are confined to relatively small areas along the Rum River. The 'basic policy <br />recommendation for the township is to-keep these areas free from development and --- <br /> <br /> <br />