Laserfiche WebLink
metropolitan area. Several municipalities within the County have <br />had the foresight to develop comprehensive plans and because of this <br />foresightedness these municipalities should not be penalized by <br />imposing a County Thoroughfare Plan upon their plans. A second <br />premise, therefore, was that the final County Thoroughfare Plan <br />should reinforce these municipal plans. <br /> <br />Inventory of Fxisting Conditions. In addition to past planning <br />activities and meetings with local officials, a complete inventory <br />of available data was conducted to provide a broad data base for <br />analyzing present conditions, development trends, and plans of the <br />civil subdivisions within the County. A review of the plans of those <br />agencies having metropolitan jurisdiction was also made to determine <br />which proposed metropolitan facilities must be incorporated into <br />the plan and which proposed metropolitan facilities could be modified <br />to fit the County's plans. <br /> <br />A considerable amount of travel data, both existing and projected, <br />was available from the Minnesota Highway Department, the Metropolitan <br />Council, and the Anoka County Highway Department. These data were <br />especially useful in determining spacing requirements of the grid <br />system introduced in the plan as well as for determining the adequacy <br />of existing facilities. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the 1970 and 1985 <br />average daily traffic volumes (ADT) in Anoka County. <br /> <br />Consideration of Future La~d-Use. Although the goal was not to <br />develop a land use plan for the County, a thoroughfare plan must not <br />only have the capability of serving existing land uses as illustrated <br />in Figure 3, but must also provide the framework for structuring <br />land use development as desired by the policy-making officials of <br />the County. Figure 4 depicts a composite of civil subdivision plans. <br />Utilizing this premise, current development trends were analyzed <br />based on existing land use and existing accessibility. In turn, <br />those elements presently planned which influence development (highways, <br />sewers, transit, soils) were analyzed to develop a projection of anti- <br />cipated additional growth without regard to the shaping influence of <br />modifications to the present County highway system. <br /> <br />The extent of anticipated urbanization by 1985 as forecasted by the <br />Joint Program, as well as the projected "urban-in-fact boundary" <br />(1,000 persons/square mile) forecasted by the Minnesota Highway De- <br />partment for 1990, were utilized. These forecasts were tempered by <br />Metropolitan Council's seven county population forecast and by the <br />Metropolitan Sewer Board's plans. The area was evaluated in terms <br />of ultimate development potential and density, and a grid arterial <br />road system was developed to serve and shape this potential. <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />