Laserfiche WebLink
P& Z-2- <br />8/7/78 <br /> <br />Kothy Schneider asked who would be responsible for determining what <br />type of screening is adcquate. As it was determined that it would be <br />the responsibility of either Clayton Berg or Mr. Schnelle, Men West <br />stated that some kind of guideline be discussed.'. It was ascertained that <br />fencing would be most feasible. <br /> <br />Ken Peterson questioned the nerd of a Cdupl'e of~cars(presently on the <br />property. Mr. Kerssen explained that two of them belonged to his brother <br />for use in demo-derbies and would be removed soon, and that the car and <br />truck in the field would be junked. Ken Peterson asked about what type <br />of noise would be generated from this type of business. Mr. Kerssen ex- <br />plained that the noise of the ginder was less than the noise of someone <br />mowing their lawn, and that his neighbors h~ve nearer commented on any noise, <br />A1 Sorteberg stated that he was interested in restrictions which would call <br />for adequate screening and a limited number of vehicles.along road. <br /> <br />Motion by Ron West, seconded by Art Dunn to recommend to the City Council <br />to grant a conditional use permit to Phillio Kerssen.to allow him to sell <br />and manufacture trailers in hJ.s garage along with selling any items taken <br />in trade.on his property located at 14765 Nowthen Blvd., subject to the <br />follo¥,ing conditions: <br /> 1.)A ma×imum of three items of any combination (trailer or trade-in) <br /> be on display with all other items adequately screened. <br /> <br /> 2.) Ali. raw materials be stored out of sight from road and adjacent <br /> property owners. <br /> <br /> 3.) That the two demo-derby cars, and the car and truck in fidld be <br /> removed. <br />Notion carried ~-1. K~thy Schneider opposed. <br /> <br />Item 2. Variance reouest - Alex Werz. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Alex Werz were present to explain that they purchased a <br />I acre lot from J.P. Scott at 16960 Bison Street N.W. in August 1972. <br />Now they have an interested buyer and because of the ordinance requiring <br />that the lot having to be recorded prior to April 27~ 1972, th. ey are <br />paying taxes on a lot they can not obtain a building permit for. <br /> <br />Mr. Werz e×p].ained that Mr. Landol Locher was the attorney at the time, <br />and believes that they had paid half his fee on the transaction and <br />fas never told that the lot was not buildab!e. <br /> <br />Gerry Zimmerman stated that Mr. Werz should have had his own attorney, <br />and would like an opinion from the City attorney in regards to -'the- <br />pre~ent situation. <br /> <br />A1Sorteb~rg stated that he realized this was hot the Werz's fault, but <br />agrees they ~bould have had own attorney and then this would have sho~,m <br />up in a title searCh, ond that he was in favor of granting a variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Werz stated that he felt the City should grant a variance so that <br />a house could be built in order to increase the taxes on the property. <br /> <br />gatWy Schneider exolained that she was concerned with how many others <br />would be coming in on Bison Street with the same ~-roblem, and the exact <br />location of the lot should be determined for easement purposes. She <br />stated that she was not opposed to granting the variance, but wished to <br /> <br /> <br />